Literature DB >> 20733427

Salter-Harris type III fractures of the distal femur: plain radiographs can be deceptive.

William C Lippert1, Richard F Owens, Eric J Wall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salter-Harris (SH) III fractures of the distal femur, although rare, can have devastating effects. The purposes of this study were to: (1) compare the intra-articular fracture displacement measured on plain x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan and (2) report the outcomes of patients with a SH III fracture of the distal femur.
METHODS: All SH III distal femur fractures treated at a large Children's Hospital with a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center between 1995 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 14 patients (average age: 13 y, 11 mo; range: 7 y, 8 mo to 17 y, 11 mo) with an average follow-up time of 21.50 months (range: 2 to 47 mo) were included in this study. Fracture displacement on plain x-ray was compared with the fracture displacement measured on MRI or CT scan. The average time between the initial plain x-ray and MRI or CT scan was 37.48 days (range: 3 h to 6 mo).
RESULTS: Plain x-rays significantly underestimated the displacement of SH III fractures versus MRI or CT scan. Six patients who had both plain x-ray and MRI or CT scan had a measured displacement of 0.42 mm and 2.70 mm, respectively (paired Student t test, P=0.005). Ten of the 14 patients (71%) had no physical limitations and full knee motion at their most recent follow-up visit. The treatment of 4 patients (29%) was changed based on the findings of the additional MRI or CT scan.
CONCLUSIONS: This study and earlier studies have shown a high rate of poor results with SH III fractures of the distal femur. This type of fracture pattern is extremely unstable and the true displacement is often underestimated by x-rays. Thus, it is strongly recommended that an MRI or CT scan be obtained on every SH III fracture of the distal femur. Moreover, any SH III fracture visible on plain radiographs should be treated with open reduction, internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20733427     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181e4f55b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  6 in total

Review 1.  Classifications In Brief: Salter-Harris Classification of Pediatric Physeal Fractures.

Authors:  Daniel J Cepela; Jason P Tartaglione; Timothy P Dooley; Prerana N Patel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Salter-Harris classification of physeal injuries.

Authors:  A N Tzavellas; E Kenanidis; M Potoupnis; S Pellios; E Tsiridis; F Sayegh
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 3.  The clinical features, management options and complications of paediatric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sean Duffy; Yael Gelfer; Alex Trompeter; Anna Clarke; Fergal Monsell
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-11

4.  Intra-articular Physeal Fractures of the Distal Femur: A Frequently Missed Diagnosis in Adolescent Athletes.

Authors:  Andrew T Pennock; Henry B Ellis; Samuel C Willimon; Charles Wyatt; Samuel E Broida; M Morgan Dennis; Tracey Bastrom
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-10

5.  Pediatric femoral shaft fractures secondary to tombstone uprooting - Two case reports.

Authors:  Malik Ali; Kedar Padhye; Luke Gauthier
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-10

6.  Ipsilateral distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyseal growth plate injury: a case report.

Authors:  Deniz Gulabi; Mehmet Erdem; Guven Bulut; Cem Coskun Avci; Murat Asci
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.