BACKGROUND: The cytokine osteopontin is involved in the pathophysiology of experimental acute kidney injury. We have tested the hypothesis that osteopontin levels might serve as a biomarker predicting outcome in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy after acute kidney injury. METHODS: We measured circulating plasma osteopontin levels in 109 critically ill patients with acute kidney injury at inception of renal replacement therapy and 4 weeks thereafter. Critically ill patients without acute kidney injury served as controls. Osteopontin was measured with ELISA. RESULTS: Baseline osteopontin levels in patients with acute kidney injury were significantly higher compared with controls (P<0.0001). Baseline osteopontin levels in patients recovering from acute kidney injury were significantly elevated compared with patients with permanent loss of kidney function after acute kidney injury (P=0.01). In addition, in patients recovering from acute kidney injury without further need for renal replacement therapy, osteopontin levels were significantly lower 4 weeks after initiation of renal replacement therapy (P=0.0005). Moreover, multivariate Cox analysis revealed osteopontin levels at renal replacement therapy inception as an independent and powerful predictor of mortality (P<0.0001). In the ROC-curve analysis, an osteopontin cut-off value of 577 ng/mL separated survivors from non-survivors with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 61% (AUC 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.89; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Osteopontin may serve as a novel biomarker for both, overall survival and renal outcome in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, that require renal replacement therapy.
BACKGROUND: The cytokine osteopontin is involved in the pathophysiology of experimental acute kidney injury. We have tested the hypothesis that osteopontin levels might serve as a biomarker predicting outcome in critically illpatients requiring renal replacement therapy after acute kidney injury. METHODS: We measured circulating plasma osteopontin levels in 109 critically illpatients with acute kidney injury at inception of renal replacement therapy and 4 weeks thereafter. Critically illpatients without acute kidney injury served as controls. Osteopontin was measured with ELISA. RESULTS: Baseline osteopontin levels in patients with acute kidney injury were significantly higher compared with controls (P<0.0001). Baseline osteopontin levels in patients recovering from acute kidney injury were significantly elevated compared with patients with permanent loss of kidney function after acute kidney injury (P=0.01). In addition, in patients recovering from acute kidney injury without further need for renal replacement therapy, osteopontin levels were significantly lower 4 weeks after initiation of renal replacement therapy (P=0.0005). Moreover, multivariate Cox analysis revealed osteopontin levels at renal replacement therapy inception as an independent and powerful predictor of mortality (P<0.0001). In the ROC-curve analysis, an osteopontin cut-off value of 577 ng/mL separated survivors from non-survivors with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 61% (AUC 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.89; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:Osteopontin may serve as a novel biomarker for both, overall survival and renal outcome in critically illpatients with acute kidney injury, that require renal replacement therapy.
Authors: Satya K Kota; Elizabeth Pernicone; David E Leaf; Isaac E Stillman; Sushrut S Waikar; Savithri Balasubramanian Kota Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Tobias Feldreich; Axel C Carlsson; Johanna Helmersson-Karlqvist; Ulf Risérus; Anders Larsson; Lars Lind; Johan Ärnlöv Journal: Cardiorenal Med Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Jessica Trostel; Luan D Truong; Carlos Roncal-Jimenez; Makoto Miyazaki; Shinobu Miyazaki-Anzai; Masanari Kuwabara; Rachel McMahan; Ana Andres-Hernando; Yuka Sato; Thomas Jensen; Miguel A Lanaspa; Richard J Johnson; Gabriela E Garcia Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2018-05-02
Authors: Luigi Mario Castello; Marco Baldrighi; Luca Molinari; Livia Salmi; Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Rosanna Vaschetto; Greta Zunino; Marco Quaglia; Mattia Bellan; Francesco Gavelli; Paolo Navalesi; Gian Carlo Avanzi; Annalisa Chiocchetti Journal: Cells Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Sherry G Mansour; Caroline Liu; Yaqi Jia; Peter P Reese; Isaac E Hall; Tarek M El-Achkar; Kaice A LaFavers; Wassim Obeid; Avi Z Rosenberg; Parnaz Daneshpajouhnejad; Mona D Doshi; Enver Akalin; Jonathan S Bromberg; Meera N Harhay; Sumit Mohan; Thangamani Muthukumar; Bernd Schröppel; Pooja Singh; Joe M El-Khoury; Francis L Weng; Heather R Thiessen-Philbrook; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Transplantation Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Patrick M Honore; Rita Jacobs; Inne Hendrickx; Elisabeth De Waele; Viola Van Gorp; Herbert D Spapen Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 9.097