Literature DB >> 20732407

In house validation of recombinant yeast estrogen and androgen receptor agonist and antagonist screening assays.

S N Kolle1, H G Kamp, H-A Huener, J Knickel, A Verlohner, C Woitkowiak, R Landsiedel, B van Ravenzwaay.   

Abstract

Besides other modes of action, endocrine disruptors may interact with hormone receptors thereby modifying the physiological function of endogenous hormones. In the present study, we report the results obtained with yeast based assays to detect the (anti-)estrogenic potential (YES) and the (anti-)androgenic potential (YAS) of 105 substances. The results show very high reproducibility and good concordance with literature data of in vivo and/or in vitro studies: the overall true positive rate, true negative rate and accuracy of the assays were 78%, 95%, and 87% (estrogen agonism), and 70%, 97%, and 90% (estrogen antagonism), 88%, 96%, and 95% (androgen agonism) and 81%, 88%, and 85% (androgen antagonism). Furthermore, the performance of the YES assay has been compared to the HeLa based transcriptional activation assay using 20 compounds. The overall true positive rate, true negative rate, and accuracy obtained for the 20 compounds were 100%, 88%, and 95% (mammalian cell based HeLa assay) and 92%, 86%, and 90% (yeast based YES assay). Taken together, the YES and YAS are robust systems, easy to handle and satisfying the requirements for screening systems that can be applied in programs including the US Environmental Protection Agency's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20732407     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  11 in total

1.  Extending an in vitro panel for estrogenicity testing: the added value of bioassays for measuring antiandrogenic activities and effects on steroidogenesis.

Authors:  Si Wang; Jeroen C W Rijk; Harrie T Besselink; René Houtman; Ad A C M Peijnenburg; Abraham Brouwer; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Toine F H Bovee
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Avoiding False Positives and Optimizing Identification of True Negatives in Estrogen Receptor Binding and Agonist/Antagonist Assays.

Authors:  Michael W Hornung; Mark A Tapper; Jeffrey S Denny; Barbara R Sheedy; Raymond Erickson; Taylor J Sulerud; Richard C Kolanczyk; Patricia K Schmieder
Journal:  Appl In Vitro Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  Quantifying Hormone Disruptors with an Engineered Bacterial Biosensor.

Authors:  Ariel L Furst; Alexander C Hoepker; Matthew B Francis
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 14.553

4.  Towards a generic physiologically based kinetic model to predict in vivo uterotrophic responses in rats by reverse dosimetry of in vitro estrogenicity data.

Authors:  Mengying Zhang; Bennard van Ravenzwaay; Eric Fabian; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Jochem Louisse
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  KnowTox: pipeline and case study for confident prediction of potential toxic effects of compounds in early phases of development.

Authors:  Andrea Morger; Miriam Mathea; Janosch H Achenbach; Antje Wolf; Roland Buesen; Klaus-Juergen Schleifer; Robert Landsiedel; Andrea Volkamer
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.514

6.  A Mechanistic High-Content Analysis Assay Using a Chimeric Androgen Receptor That Rapidly Characterizes Androgenic Chemicals.

Authors:  Adam T Szafran; Michael J Bolt; Caroline E Obkirchner; Maureen G Mancini; Christine Helsen; Frank Claessens; Fabio Stossi; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.341

7.  Mixture Effects of Estrogenic Pesticides at the Human Estrogen Receptor α and β.

Authors:  Bettina Seeger; Frank Klawonn; Boris Nguema Bekale; Pablo Steinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Use of a Battery of Chemical and Ecotoxicological Methods for the Assessment of the Efficacy of Wastewater Treatment Processes to Remove Estrogenic Potency.

Authors:  Nicola Beresford; Alice Baynes; Rakesh Kanda; Matthew R Mills; Karla Arias-Salazar; Terrence J Collins; Susan Jobling
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Construction of reporter gene assays using CWP and PDR mutant yeasts for enhanced detection of various sex steroids.

Authors:  Sayoko Ito-Harashima; Mami Matano; Kana Onishi; Tomofumi Nomura; Saki Nakajima; Shingo Ebata; Kazuhiro Shiizaki; Masanobu Kawanishi; Takashi Yagi
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2020-05-27

10.  Development of a Generic Physiologically Based Kinetic Model to Predict In Vivo Uterotrophic Responses Induced by Estrogenic Chemicals in Rats Based on In Vitro Bioassays.

Authors:  Mengying Zhang; Bennard van Ravenzwaay; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.