Literature DB >> 20730784

Attitudes of pregnant women regarding termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality.

A P Souka1, V D Michalitsi, H Skentou, H Euripioti, G K Papadopoulos, D Kassanos, I E Messinis, E E Salamalekis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the attitudes of pregnant women towards termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was completed by all pregnant women attending routine ultrasound scan. They were asked whether they would opt for termination of the pregnancy in case the fetus was diagnosed with one of the following abnormalities: lethal anomaly, anomaly causing developmental delay, anomaly causing physical handicap, anomaly causing disfigurement and severe anomaly diagnosed after 24 weeks of pregnancy. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the effect of a variety of demographic and socio-economic characteristics in their choices.
RESULTS: A total of 533 women completed the questionnaire out of which 447 (86%) would terminate the pregnancy in case of lethal fetal anomaly. The corresponding figures for anomaly causing developmental delay, anomaly causing physical handicap and anomaly causing disfigurement were 396 (77.8%), 332 (65.9%) and 228 (45.2%). A total of 313 (64.7%) would request late termination owing to severe anomaly. The only two statistically significant factors that influenced the maternal decision on pregnancy termination were religious beliefs and the frequency of practicing religious duties (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The majority of pregnant women would terminate pregnancy for lethal fetal anomaly and for an anomaly causing mental or physical handicap, even in late pregnancy.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20730784     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  5 in total

1.  Support Desired by Women Following Termination of Pregnancy for a Fetal Anomaly.

Authors:  Aarti Ramdaney; Syed S Hashmi; Manju Monga; Rebecca Carter; Jennifer Czerwinski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Prenatal diagnosis in low resource setting: is it acceptable?

Authors:  Hend Abdel Rahaman Shalaby; Reda Abd Elhady; Anas Mohamed Gamal; Ahmed Al Badry
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-10-03

3.  When fetal hydronephrosis is suspected antenatally--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marie Oscarsson; Tomas Gottvall; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Written narratives from immigrants following a prenatal diagnosis: qualitative exploratory study.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Banaz Balbas; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Francesca Bardi; Merel Bakker; Monique J A Kenkhuis; Adelita V Ranchor; Marian K Bakker; Ayten Elvan; Erwin Birnie; Caterina M Bilardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.