Laura C Hanson1, Robin Gilliam, Tae Joon Lee. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7550, USA. lhanson@med.unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One in four Americans, and 70% of people who have dementia, will spend their final days in nursing home care. Clinical research, particularly clinical trials, rarely includes this population due to unique challenges in research methods and ethics. Families of advanced dementia patients make choices about tube feeding and other feeding options with limited access to information or communication. The cluster randomized trial, Improving Decision Making about Feeding Options for Dementia Patients, tests a decision aid intervention to improve the quality of decision making for this choice. PURPOSE: Our objectives are (1) to describe the methods used in this trial; (2) to describe challenges and strategies for effective nursing home and nursing home resident recruitment and retention; and (3) to describe research ethics approaches to minimize harms and maximize benefits for this population. METHODS: The study is a cluster randomized trial of a decision aid to inform and support the choice between tube feeding and assisted oral feeding in advanced dementia. Study subjects are paired surrogate decision makers and residents with advanced dementia and feeding problems, enrolled from nursing homes in North Carolina. RESULTS: This trial enrolled 256 paired surrogate decision makers and residents in 24 nursing home sites, and 99% completed participation through the 3-month study period. The research team had prior clinical and investigative experience in this setting, and used multiple strategies to recruit and retain nursing home sites, providers, surrogates, and the residents for whom they spoke. Informed consent and human subjects' protections were designed to address the vulnerability of this population. LIMITATIONS: Cluster randomization was necessary to avoid contamination between control and intervention subjects, but may introduce confounding by site and intracluster correlation effects in analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies that facilitate nursing home recruitment, participant recruitment and protection of human subjects for a vulnerable population may be used by future investigators to expand the research evidence base for nursing home and dementia care.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: One in four Americans, and 70% of people who have dementia, will spend their final days in nursing home care. Clinical research, particularly clinical trials, rarely includes this population due to unique challenges in research methods and ethics. Families of advanced dementiapatients make choices about tube feeding and other feeding options with limited access to information or communication. The cluster randomized trial, Improving Decision Making about Feeding Options for DementiaPatients, tests a decision aid intervention to improve the quality of decision making for this choice. PURPOSE: Our objectives are (1) to describe the methods used in this trial; (2) to describe challenges and strategies for effective nursing home and nursing home resident recruitment and retention; and (3) to describe research ethics approaches to minimize harms and maximize benefits for this population. METHODS: The study is a cluster randomized trial of a decision aid to inform and support the choice between tube feeding and assisted oral feeding in advanced dementia. Study subjects are paired surrogate decision makers and residents with advanced dementia and feeding problems, enrolled from nursing homes in North Carolina. RESULTS: This trial enrolled 256 paired surrogate decision makers and residents in 24 nursing home sites, and 99% completed participation through the 3-month study period. The research team had prior clinical and investigative experience in this setting, and used multiple strategies to recruit and retain nursing home sites, providers, surrogates, and the residents for whom they spoke. Informed consent and human subjects' protections were designed to address the vulnerability of this population. LIMITATIONS: Cluster randomization was necessary to avoid contamination between control and intervention subjects, but may introduce confounding by site and intracluster correlation effects in analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies that facilitate nursing home recruitment, participant recruitment and protection of human subjects for a vulnerable population may be used by future investigators to expand the research evidence base for nursing home and dementia care.
Authors: M Holmes-Rovner; J Kroll; N Schmitt; D R Rovner; M L Breer; M L Rothert; G Padonu; G Talarczyk Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 1996 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Susan M McCurry; David M LaFazia; Kenneth C Pike; Rebecca G Logsdon; Linda Teri Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: E Amanda Snyder; Anthony J Caprio; Kathryn Wessell; Feng Chang Lin; Laura C Hanson Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Andrea Daddato; Heidi L Wald; Carolyn Horney; Diane L Fairclough; Erin C Leister; Marilyn Coors; Warren H Capell; Rebecca S Boxer Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Mary Ersek; Justine S Sefcik; Feng-Chang Lin; Tae Joon Lee; Robin Gilliam; Laura C Hanson Journal: Clin Nurs Res Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 2.075
Authors: Camilla B Pimentel; Whitney L Mills; Jennifer A Palmer; Kristen Dillon; Jennifer L Sullivan; Nancy J Wewiorski; Andrea Lynn Snow; Rebecca S Allen; Susan D Hopkins; Christine W Hartmann Journal: J Nurs Care Qual Date: 2019 Jul/Sep Impact factor: 1.597
Authors: Virginia P Tilden; Sarah A Thompson; Byron J Gajewski; Colleen M Buescher; Marjorie J Bott Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: C J Evans; E Yorganci; P Lewis; J Koffman; K Stone; I Tunnard; B Wee; W Bernal; M Hotopf; I J Higginson Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 8.775