Literature DB >> 20728981

Serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: are there real differences between these two entities?

Virginia Benito1, Amina Lubrano, Octavio Arencibia, Norberto Medina, Elisa Álvarez Eva, Miguel Andújar, Miguel Falcón Juan, Orlando Falcón.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcome and pathological features of patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) with special emphasis on serous and mucinous histology. STUDY
DESIGN: Medical and anatomopathological records were reviewed in the Gynecological Oncology Department of the Canarian University Hospital between 1990 and 2005. Survival rates were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
RESULTS: The study included 163 patients. Serous tumors corresponded to 68 cases and mucinous tumors to 91 cases. Eighty-nine percent of patients were at FIGO stage I, 1.2% at stage II and 9.8% at stage III. Serous histology was significantly related to the presence of peritoneal implants (22.4% vs 3.6%; p=0.001), positive peritoneal cytology (35.7% vs 8.5%; p=0.001) and bilaterality (27.9% vs 1.1%, p<0.0001). Event-free survival (EFS) rates at 2, 5 and 10 years were 96.7%, 92.7% and 90.5%, respectively, with a mean survival time of 183 months (CI 95% 172-193). Thirteen recurrence cases were found (7.9%) with a mean time to recurrence of 39.6 months (range 4-140). Overall survival (OS) rates at 2, 5 and 10 years were 100%, 96.4% and 93.6%, respectively, with a mean time of 189 months (CI 95% 179-198). Mucinous BOT were associated with significantly lower OS rates than serous BOT (10 years OS: 88.5% vs 98.2%; p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Serous tumors present more unfavorable anatomopathological characteristics but are associated with better prognosis than mucinous tumors. If mucinous BOT diagnosis is retained physicians should be aware that their aggressive potential is not negligible.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20728981     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  5 in total

1.  Unilateral cystectomy and serous histology are associated with relapse in borderline ovarian tumor patients with fertility-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Na Li; Xiu Ming; Zhengyu Li
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  Recent concepts of ovarian carcinogenesis: type I and type II.

Authors:  Masafumi Koshiyama; Noriomi Matsumura; Ikuo Konishi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Retrospective Analysis of Factors Affecting Recurrence in Borderline Ovarian Tumors.

Authors:  Mariam Anjum Ifthikar; Anupama Rajanbabu; Indu R Nair; Vinita Murali; Anjaly S Nair
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-19

Review 4.  The challenging management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) in women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Luigi Della Corte; Antonio Mercorio; Paolo Serafino; Francesco Viciglione; Mario Palumbo; Maria Chiara De Angelis; Maria Borgo; Cira Buonfantino; Marina Tesorone; Giuseppe Bifulco; Pierluigi Giampaolino
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-23

5.  Histologic distribution of borderline ovarian tumors worldwide: a systematic review.

Authors:  Taejong Song; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.