Literature DB >> 20728553

Diffusion weighted imaging distinguishes the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state.

Davinia Fernández-Espejo1, Tristan Bekinschtein, Martin M Monti, John D Pickard, Carme Junque, Martin R Coleman, Adrian M Owen.   

Abstract

The vegetative (VS) and minimally conscious (MCS) states are currently distinguished on the basis of exhibited behaviour rather than underlying pathology. Although previous histopathological studies have documented different degrees of diffuse axonal injury as well as damage to the thalami and brainstem regions in VS and MCS, these differences have not been assessed in vivo, and therefore, do not provide a measurable pathological marker to aid clinical diagnosis. Currently, the diagnostic decision-making process is highly subjective and prone to error. Indeed, previous work has suggested that up to 43% of patients in this group may be misdiagnosed. We used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to study the neuropathology of 25 vegetative and minimally conscious patients in vivo and to identify measures that could potentially distinguish the patients in these two groups. Mean diffusivity (MD) maps of the subcortical white matter, brainstem and thalami were generated. The MCS and VS patients differed significantly in subcortical white matter and thalamic regions, but appeared not to differ in the brainstem. Moreover, the DTI results predicted scores on the Coma Recovery Scale (p<0.001) and successfully classified the patients in to their appropriate diagnostic categories with an accuracy of 95%. The results suggest that this method may provide an objective and highly accurate method for classifying these challenging patient populations and may therefore complement the behavioural assessment to inform the diagnostic decision making process.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20728553     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  73 in total

1.  Comment on "Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state".

Authors:  Jean-Rémi King; Tristan Bekinschtein; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Persistent vegetative state: an ethical reappraisal.

Authors:  Daniela Tarquini; Maria Congedo; Fabio Formaglio; Maddalena Gasparini; Norina Marcello; Corinna Porteri; Eugenio Pucci; Silvia Zullo; Carlo A Defanti
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  The vegetative and minimally conscious states: a review of the literature and preliminary survey of prevalence in Ireland.

Authors:  M Ní Lochlainn; S Gubbins; S Connolly; R B Reilly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Conscious awareness in patients in vegetative states: myth or reality?

Authors:  Gastone G Celesia
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Neuroimage-Based Consciousness Evaluation of Patients with Secondary Doubtful Hydrocephalus Before and After Lumbar Drainage.

Authors:  Jiayu Huo; Zengxin Qi; Sen Chen; Qian Wang; Xuehai Wu; Di Zang; Tanikawa Hiromi; Jiaxing Tan; Lichi Zhang; Weijun Tang; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.203

6.  Longitudinal increases in structural connectome segregation and functional connectome integration are associated with better recovery after mild TBI.

Authors:  Amy F Kuceyeski; Keith W Jamison; Julia P Owen; Ashish Raj; Pratik Mukherjee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems.

Authors:  Christof Koch; Marcello Massimini; Melanie Boly; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Function-structure connectivity in patients with severe brain injury as measured by MRI-DWI and FDG-PET.

Authors:  J Annen; L Heine; E Ziegler; G Frasso; M Bahri; C Di Perri; J Stender; C Martial; S Wannez; K D'ostilio; E Amico; G Antonopoulos; C Bernard; F Tshibanda; R Hustinx; S Laureys
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Disentangling disorders of consciousness: Insights from diffusion tensor imaging and machine learning.

Authors:  Zhong S Zheng; Nicco Reggente; Evan Lutkenhoff; Adrian M Owen; Martin M Monti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Functional imaging reveals movement preparatory activity in the vegetative state.

Authors:  Tristan Andres Bekinschtein; Facundo Francisco Manes; Mirta Villarreal; Adrian Mark Owen; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.