Literature DB >> 20728550

Investigating brain response to music: a comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes.

Karsten Mueller1, Toralf Mildner, Thomas Fritz, Jöran Lepsien, Christian Schwarzbauer, Matthias L Schroeter, Harald E Möller.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in auditory experiments is a challenge, because the scanning procedure produces considerable noise that can interfere with the auditory paradigm. The noise might either mask the auditory material presented, or interfere with stimuli designed to evoke emotions because it sounds loud and rather unpleasant. Therefore, scanning paradigms that allow interleaved auditory stimulation and image acquisition appear to be advantageous. The sparse temporal sampling (STS) technique uses a very long repetition time in order to achieve a stimulus presentation in the absence of scanner noise. Although only relatively few volumes are acquired for the resulting data sets, there have been recent studies where this method has furthered remarkable results. A new development is the interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) technique. Compared with STS, this method is capable of acquiring several volumes in the time frame between the auditory trials (while the magnetization is kept in a steady state during stimulus presentation). In order to draw conclusions about the optimum fMRI procedure with auditory stimulation, different echo-planar imaging (EPI) acquisition schemes were compared: Continuous scanning, STS, and ISSS. The total acquisition time of each sequence was adjusted to about 12.5 min. The results indicate that the ISSS approach exhibits the highest sensitivity in detecting subtle activity in sub-cortical brain regions.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20728550     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  15 in total

1.  Tension-related activity in the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala: an fMRI study with music.

Authors:  Moritz Lehne; Martin Rohrmeier; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions.

Authors:  Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Electroencephalography reflects the activity of sub-cortical brain regions during approach-withdrawal behaviour while listening to music.

Authors:  Ian Daly; Duncan Williams; Faustina Hwang; Alexis Kirke; Eduardo R Miranda; Slawomir J Nasuto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Less noise, more activation: Multiband acquisition schemes for auditory functional MRI.

Authors:  Federico De Martino; Michelle Moerel; Kamil Ugurbil; Elia Formisano; Essa Yacoub
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Predictions interact with missing sensory evidence in semantic processing areas.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Alexandra Bendixen; Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Toralf Mildner; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Effective connectivity between superior temporal gyrus and Heschl's gyrus during white noise listening: linear versus non-linear models.

Authors:  Ka Hamid; An Yusoff; Mza Rahman; M Mohamad; Aia Hamid
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2012-04-01

7.  The Band Effect-Physically Strenuous Music Making Increases Esthetic Appreciation of Music.

Authors:  Thomas H Fritz; Lydia Schneider; Arno Villringer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  FMRI scanner noise interaction with affective neural processes.

Authors:  Stavros Skouras; Marcus Gray; Hugo Critchley; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intact brain processing of musical emotions in autism spectrum disorder, but more cognitive load and arousal in happy vs. sad music.

Authors:  Line Gebauer; Joshua Skewes; Gitte Westphael; Pamela Heaton; Peter Vuust
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.