Literature DB >> 20728286

Selected outcomes of thumb replantation after isolated thumb amputation injury.

Jayant P Agarwal1, Matthew J Trovato, Shailesh Agarwal, Paul N Hopkins, Darrell Brooks, Greg Buncke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess thumb survival, pinch strength, grip strength, and need for secondary surgery in patients undergoing thumb replantation after isolated thumb amputation injury.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 52 consecutive isolated thumb replantations performed over a 4.5-year period. Charts were reviewed for mechanism of injury, level of amputation, and surgical technique. Primary outcomes of interest included survival and secondary surgery (eg, tenolysis, neurolysis) rates. Functional outcome was assessed by pinch and grip strengths after a mean follow-up period of 10 months from the initial injury.
RESULTS: The overall thumb survival rate was 92% (48 of 52). One hundred percent of Zone I injuries (13 of 13), 94% of zone II injuries (29 of 31), and 75% of zone III injuries (6 of 8) survived; overall survival was 94% in sharp injuries (32 of 34), 89% in avulsion injuries (8 of 9), and 89% in crush injuries (8 of 9). Secondary surgery was performed in 18 patients with increasing need across the 3 zones (0%, 42%, and 63%, respectively; p for trend = .002). Pinch and grip strengths of 17 patients after an average follow-up period of 10 months were significantly worse after crush/avulsion injuries (p = .007 and .07, respectively) and injuries requiring joint intervention (p = .004 and .02, respectively); grip strength was also found to be negatively associated with increasing zone of injury.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that a high rate of survival can be achieved after thumb replantation using current techniques. In addition, the need for secondary surgery is strongly related to zone of injury, with zone I injuries requiring the least amount of secondary surgery. Finally, pinch and grip strengths may be worse after crush or avulsion injuries and injuries requiring joint intervention. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV. Copyright 2010 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20728286     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Digital Replantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Syena Moltaji; Matteo Gallo; Chloe Wong; Jessica Murphy; Lucas Gallo; Daniel Waltho; Andrea Copeland; Marta Karpinski; Sadek Mowakket; Eric Duku; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2020-04-09

2.  Disparities in Access to Care Following Traumatic Digit Amputation.

Authors:  Chao Long; Paola A Suarez; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Catherine Curtin
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-01-31

3.  Disability and health after replantation or revascularisation in the upper extremity in a population in southern Sweden - a retrospective long time follow up.

Authors:  Hans-Eric Rosberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Transplantation of a Free Vascularized Joint Flap from the Second Toe for the Acute Reconstruction of Defects in the Thumb and other Fingers.

Authors:  Jihui Ju; Lei Li; Ruixing Hou
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Functional outcome after digit replantation versus amputation.

Authors:  Sarah M Bott; Katarzyna Rachunek; Fabian Medved; Thomas S Bott; Adrien Daigeler; Theodora Wahler
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-07-27

6.  Cost-effectiveness of Finger Replantation Compared With Revision Amputation.

Authors:  Alfred P Yoon; Tanvi Mahajani; David W Hutton; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.