Literature DB >> 20728196

Evolution of community-based arsenic removal systems in remote villages in West Bengal, India: assessment of decade-long operation.

Sudipta Sarkar1, John E Greenleaf, Anirban Gupta, Debabrata Ghosh, Lee M Blaney, P Bandyopadhyay, R K Biswas, Amal K Dutta, Arup K Sengupta.   

Abstract

In Bangladesh and the neighboring state of West Bengal, India, over 100 million people are affected by widespread arsenic poisoning through drinking water drawn from underground sources containing arsenic at concentrations well above the permissible limit of 50 μg/L. The health effects caused by arsenic poisoning in this area is as catastrophic as any other natural calamity that occurred throughout the world in recent times. Since 1997, over 200 community level arsenic removal units have been installed in Indian subcontinent through collaboration between Bengal Engineering and Science University (BESU), India and Lehigh University, USA. Approximately 200,000 villagers collect arsenic-safe potable water from these units on a daily basis. The treated water is also safe for drinking with regard to its total dissolved solids, hardness, iron and manganese content. The units use regenerable arsenic-selective adsorbents. Regular maintenance and upkeep of the units is administered by the villagers through formation of villagers' water committee. The villagers contribute towards the cost of operation through collection of a small water tariff. Upon exhaustion, the adsorbents are regenerated in a central facility by a few trained villagers. The process of regeneration reduces the volume of disposable arsenic-laden solids by nearly two orders of magnitude and allows for the reuse of the adsorbent material. Finally, the arsenic-laden solids are contained on well-aerated coarse sand filters with minimum arsenic leaching. This disposal technique is scientifically more appropriate than dumping arsenic-loaded adsorbents in the reducing environment of landfills as currently practiced in developed countries including the United States. The design of the units underwent several modifications over last ten years to enhance the efficiency in terms of arsenic removal, ease of maintenance and ecologically safe containment and disposal of treatment residuals. The continued safe operation of these units has amply demonstrated that use of regenerable arsenic-selective adsorbents is quite viable in remote locations. The technology and associated socio-economic management of the units have matured over the years, generating promise for rapid replication in other severely arsenic-affected countries in Southeast Asia.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20728196     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  9 in total

1.  Removing arsenic from groundwater in Cambodia using high performance iron adsorbent.

Authors:  Y Kang; R Takeda; A Nada; L Thavarith; S Tang; K Nuki; K Sakurai
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Invited commentary: use of arsenical skin lesions to predict risk of internal cancer: implications for prevention and future research.

Authors:  Habibul Ahsan; Craig Steinmaus
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Interaction of arsenic species with tropical river aquatic humic substances enriched with aluminum and iron.

Authors:  Lilian Karla de Oliveira; Camila de Almeida Melo; Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto; Kurt Friese; André Henrique Rosa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a review of sources, prevalence, health risks, and strategies for mitigation.

Authors:  Shiv Shankar; Uma Shanker
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-14

Review 5.  A Systematic Review: Costing and Financing of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) in Schools.

Authors:  Shannon M McGinnis; Thomas McKeon; Richa Desai; Akudo Ejelonu; Stanley Laskowski; Heather M Murphy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Estimating the cost of interventions to improve water, sanitation and hygiene in healthcare facilities across India.

Authors:  Katie K Tseng; Jyoti Joshi; Susmita Shrivastava; Eili Klein
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-12

Review 7.  How community participation in water and sanitation interventions impacts human health, WASH infrastructure and service longevity in low-income and middle-income countries: a realist review.

Authors:  Sarah Nelson; Dorothy Drabarek; Aaron Jenkins; Joel Negin; Seye Abimbola
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Arsenic contaminated groundwater and its treatment options in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Jia-Qian Jiang; S M Ashekuzzaman; Anlun Jiang; S M Sharifuzzaman; Sayedur Rahman Chowdhury
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Urinary and dietary analysis of 18,470 bangladeshis reveal a correlation of rice consumption with arsenic exposure and toxicity.

Authors:  Stephanie Melkonian; Maria Argos; Megan N Hall; Yu Chen; Faruque Parvez; Brandon Pierce; Hongyuan Cao; Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Alauddin Ahmed; Tariqul Islam; Vesna Slavcovich; Mary Gamble; Parvez I Haris; Joseph H Graziano; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.