BACKGROUND: We compared the contractile responses to endothelin-1 (ET-1) with and without the inhibition of ET-A receptors and protein kinase C-alpha (PKC-α) in the human peripheral microvasculature of diabetic and case-matched, nondiabetic patients. METHODS: Chest wall skeletal muscle was harvested from patients with and without diabetics undergoing cardiac surgery. Peripheral arterioles (90-180 μm in diameter) were dissected from the harvested tissue. Microvascular constriction was assessed by videomicroscopy in response to ET-1 with and without an endothelin-A (ET-A) receptor antagonist, an endothelin B (ET-B) antagonist, or a PKC-α inhibitor. RESULTS: ET-1 induced a dose-dependent contractile response of skeletal muscle arterioles from diabetic and nondiabetic patients. The contractile response of diabetic arterioles from both prebypass and postbypass to ET-1 (10(-9) mol/L) was decreased compared with those of nondiabetic patients (P < .05). The contractile responses of microvessels of both diabetics and nondiabetics to ET-1 were inhibited in the presence of either ET-A receptor antagonist BQ123 (10(-7) mol/L) or the PKC-α inhibitor safingol (2 × 10(-5) mol/L, P < .05, respectively). In contrast, the ET-1-induced vasoconstriction was not affected by the administration of the ET-B receptor antagonist BQ788 (10(-7) mol/L). There were no differences in skeletal muscle levels of the ET-A and ET-B receptors between diabetic and nondiabetic groups. CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients demonstrated a decreased contractile response to ET-1 in human peripheral microvasculature. The contractile response of diabetic vessels to ET-1 occurs via activation of ET-A receptors and PKC-α. These results provide novel mechanisms of ET-1-induced contraction in vasomotor dysfunction in patients with diabetes. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: We compared the contractile responses to endothelin-1 (ET-1) with and without the inhibition of ET-A receptors and protein kinase C-alpha (PKC-α) in the human peripheral microvasculature of diabetic and case-matched, nondiabeticpatients. METHODS: Chest wall skeletal muscle was harvested from patients with and without diabetics undergoing cardiac surgery. Peripheral arterioles (90-180 μm in diameter) were dissected from the harvested tissue. Microvascular constriction was assessed by videomicroscopy in response to ET-1 with and without an endothelin-A (ET-A) receptor antagonist, an endothelin B (ET-B) antagonist, or a PKC-α inhibitor. RESULTS:ET-1 induced a dose-dependent contractile response of skeletal muscle arterioles from diabetic and nondiabeticpatients. The contractile response of diabetic arterioles from both prebypass and postbypass to ET-1 (10(-9) mol/L) was decreased compared with those of nondiabeticpatients (P < .05). The contractile responses of microvessels of both diabetics and nondiabetics to ET-1 were inhibited in the presence of either ET-A receptor antagonist BQ123 (10(-7) mol/L) or the PKC-α inhibitor safingol (2 × 10(-5) mol/L, P < .05, respectively). In contrast, the ET-1-induced vasoconstriction was not affected by the administration of the ET-B receptor antagonist BQ788 (10(-7) mol/L). There were no differences in skeletal muscle levels of the ET-A and ET-B receptors between diabetic and nondiabetic groups. CONCLUSION:Diabeticpatients demonstrated a decreased contractile response to ET-1 in human peripheral microvasculature. The contractile response of diabetic vessels to ET-1 occurs via activation of ET-A receptors and PKC-α. These results provide novel mechanisms of ET-1-induced contraction in vasomotor dysfunction in patients with diabetes. Copyright Â
Authors: Marc Ruel; Tanveer A Khan; Pierre Voisine; Cesario Bianchi; Frank W Sellke Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Jun Feng; Yuhong Liu; Richard T Clements; Neel R Sodha; Kamal R Khabbaz; Venkatachalam Senthilnathan; Katherine K Nishimura; Seth L Alper; Frank W Sellke Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rachael L Ford; Ira M Mains; Ebony J Hilton; Scott T Reeves; Robert E Stroud; Fred A Crawford; John S Ikonomidis; Francis G Spinale Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jun Feng; Yuhong Liu; Kamal R Khabbaz; Robert Hagberg; Neel R Sodha; Robert M Osipov; Frank W Sellke Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Neel R Sodha; Jun Feng; Richard T Clements; Cesario Bianchi; Munir Boodhwani; Basel Ramlawi; Shigetoshi Mieno; Kamal R Khabbaz; Frank W Sellke Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Yuhong Liu; Eric W Sellke; Jun Feng; Richard T Clements; Neel R Sodha; Kamal R Khabbaz; Venkatachalam Senthilnathan; Seth L Alper; Frank W Sellke Journal: Surgery Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Mary E Lott; Julia E Slocomb; Zhaohui Gao; Robert A Gabbay; David Quillen; Thomas W Gardner; Kerstin Bettermann Journal: Microvasc Res Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 3.514
Authors: Jun Feng; Yuhong Liu; Ashraf A Sabe; Ahmed A Sadek; Arun K Singh; Neel R Sodha; Frank W Sellke Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Jun Feng; Yuhong Liu; Arun K Singh; Afshin Ehsan; Nicholas Sellke; Justin Liang; Frank W Sellke Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Jun Feng; Yuhong Liu; Louis M Chu; Arun K Singh; Nikola Dobrilovic; James G Fingleton; Richard T Clements; Cesario Bianchi; Frank W Sellke Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jun Feng; Yuhong Liu; Nikola Dobrilovic; Louis M Chu; Cesario Bianchi; Arun K Singh; Frank W Sellke Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 29.690