Literature DB >> 20727548

Early graft function after laparoscopically procured living donor kidney transplantation.

Mark Tyson1, Erik Castle, Paul Andrews, Raymond Heilman, Kristin Mekeel, Adyr Moss, David Mulligan, Kunam Reddy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined predictors of poor early graft function after laparoscopic living donor kidney transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an institutional review board approved review of the living donor kidney transplantation database at our institution.
RESULTS: Seven of the 510 transplants (1%) were excluded from study due to immediate graft nephrectomy for vascular complications. Of the remaining 503 transplants 48 (9.5%) and 18 (3.6%) had slow and delayed graft function, respectively. Recipient male gender (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.05-3.91, p = 0.035), black ethnicity (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.34, p = 0.020) and donor age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, p = 0.021) emerged as independent predictors of poor early graft function in multivariate logistic regression models. Poor early graft function strongly redisposed patients to acute rejection during year 1 (HR 3.43, 95% CI 2.04-5.77, p <0.0001) while grafts from genetically related donors conferred a protective effect (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66, p <0.0001). Three-year death censored allograft survival was lower in the delayed and slow graft function groups than in the immediate function group (89% and 87% vs 98%, p = 0.0068 and 0.0002, respectively). Overall 3-year patient survival was lower in the delayed than in the immediate function group (81% vs 94%, p <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Male black recipients of laparoscopically procured living donor kidney transplants from donors older than 50 years are at higher risk for poor early graft function, which in turn strongly predicts acute rejection during year 1. This is significant since excellent early graft function confers specific recipient and allograft survival advantages, and may assist physicians in better understanding the various recipient, donor and perioperative parameters that influence clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20727548     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Pretransplant transcriptome profiles identify among kidneys with delayed graft function those with poorer quality and outcome.

Authors:  Valeria R Mas; Mariano J Scian; Kellie J Archer; Jihee L Suh; Krystle G David; Qing Ren; Todd W B Gehr; Anne L King; Marc P Posner; Thomas F Mueller; Daniel G Maluf
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 6.354

2.  Poor early graft function impairs long-term outcome in living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  J Hellegering; J Visser; H J Kloke; F C H D'Ancona; A J Hoitsma; J A van der Vliet; M C Warlé
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Delayed Graft Function 5 Months After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Tim Schulz; Alexandra Pries; Matthias Kapischke
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2016-02-26

4.  Risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients receiving a steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.

Authors:  Michelle Willicombe; Anna Rizzello; Dawn Goodall; Vassilios Papalois; Adam G McLean; David Taube
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2017-02-24

Review 5.  Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Reduces Long Term Renal Graft Survival: Mechanism and Beyond.

Authors:  Hailin Zhao; Azeem Alam; Aurelie Pac Soo; Andrew J T George; Daqing Ma
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 8.143

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.