Literature DB >> 20727457

Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab versus pemetrexed for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Italy.

Giovanni Giuliani1, Francesco Grossi, Filippo de Marinis, Stefan Walzer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The new targeted agent bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine (BCG), and a third-generation chemotherapy pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin (PC), are approved as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: An indirect comparison between BCG and PC showed that the bevacizumab triplet achieved a favourable hazard ratio in terms of progression-free survival among patients with advanced NSCLC. This analysis aimed to compare the detailed costs and benefits of these treatments for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Italy.
RESULTS: The monthly cost of single-agent bevacizumab, including administration and supportive care costs, and costs for adverse events as a single agent was 4,007 euro/patient less than pemetrexed over the patient's lifetime. BCG also achieved a mean gain of 0.12 life-years compared with PC over this period. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of BCG relative to PC was calculated to be 34,919 euro per additional life-year gained suggesting that BCG is cost-effective compared with PC as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in Italy.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, bevacizumab-based therapy can be considered as a cost-effective option when compared to chemotherapy treatments such as pemetrexed for the treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20727457     DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5002(10)70133-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  8 in total

Review 1.  Tumor control versus adverse events with targeted anticancer therapies.

Authors:  Dorothy M K Keefe; Emma H Bateman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Economic Considerations in the Use of Novel Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Hamzeh Albaba; Charles Lim; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Use of Intermediate Endpoints in the Economic Evaluation of New Treatments for Advanced Cancer and Methods Adopted When Suitable Overall Survival Data are Not Available.

Authors:  Catherine Beauchemin; Marie-Ève Lapierre; Nathalie Letarte; Louise Yelle; Jean Lachaine
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Economic evaluation of bevacizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Chun-Ru Chien; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2012-07-25

Review 5.  Economic evaluation of first-line and maintenance treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Chouaïd; Perinne Crequit; Isabelle Borget; Alain Vergnenegre
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 6.  A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Ansgar Lange; Anne Prenzler; Martin Frank; Heiko Golpon; Tobias Welte; J-Matthias von der Schulenburg
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening and treatment methods: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Farbod Ebadifard Azar; Saber Azami-Aghdash; Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar; Alireza Mazdaki; Aziz Rezapour; Parvin Ebrahimi; Negar Yousefzadeh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Update on the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on the cost-effectiveness of new agents.

Authors:  A Vergnenègre; I Borget; C Chouaid
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-04-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.