Literature DB >> 20727009

Habituation of evoked responses is greater in patients with familial hemiplegic migraine than in controls: a contrast with the common forms of migraine.

J M Hansen1, M Bolla, D Magis, V de Pasqua, M Ashina, L L Thomsen, J Olesen, J Schoenen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) is a rare, dominantly inherited subtype of migraine with transient hemiplegia during the aura phase. Mutations in at least three different genes can produce the FHM phenotype. The mutated FHM genes code for ion transport proteins that animal and cellular studies have associated with disturbed ion homeostasis, altered cellular excitability, neurotransmitter release, and decreased threshold for cortical spreading depression. The common forms of migraine are characterized interictally by a habituation deficit of cortical and subcortical evoked responses that has been attributed to neuronal dysexcitability. FHM and the common forms of migraine are thought to belong to a spectrum of migraine phenotypes with similar pathophysiology, and we therefore examined whether an abnormal habituation pattern would also be found in FHM patients.
METHODS: In a group of genotyped FHM patients (five FHM-1, four FHM-2), we measured habituation of visual evoked potentials (VEP), auditory evoked potentials including intensity dependence (IDAP), the nociception-specific blink reflex (nsBR) and compared the results to a group of healthy volunteers (HV).
RESULTS: FHM patients had a more pronounced habituation during VEP (P=0.025) and nsBR recordings (P=0.023) than HV. There was no difference for IDAP, but the slope tended to be steeper in FHM.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to the common forms of migraine, FHM patients are not characterized by a deficient, but rather by an increased habituation in cortical/brain stem evoked activities. These results suggest differences between FHM and the common forms of migraine, as far as central neuronal processing is concerned.
© 2010 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology © 2010 EFNS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20727009     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03190.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  5 in total

Review 1.  Where does a migraine attack originate? In the brainstem.

Authors:  J Tajti; D Szok; Á Párdutz; B Tuka; A Csáti; A Kuris; J Toldi; L Vécsei
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Philip R Holland; Margarida Martins-Oliveira; Jan Hoffmann; Christoph Schankin; Simon Akerman
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 3.  Ictal epileptic headache: an old story with courses and appeals.

Authors:  Pasquale Parisi; Pasquale Striano; Andrea Negro; Paolo Martelletti; Vincenzo Belcastro
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 7.277

4.  Contact heat evoked potentials and habituation measured interictally in migraineurs.

Authors:  Lena Clara Beese; Denise Putzer; Nani Osada; Stefan Evers; Martin Marziniak
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 5.  Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Vincenzo Parisi; Marco Lisicki; Mariano Serrao; Francesco Pierelli
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 7.277

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.