Literature DB >> 2072693

Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons.

A K Nabelek1, F M Tucker, T R Letowski.   

Abstract

One of the frequently quoted reasons for the rejection of hearing aids is amplification of background noise. The relationship between hearing aid use and toleration of background noise was assessed. Four groups of elderly subjects (at least 65 years old) and one group of young subjects with normal hearing participated in the study. Each group consisted of 15 subjects. The young subjects and elderly subjects in one group with relatively good hearing were tested for comparison with the hearing-impaired subjects. Elderly subjects in the three remaining groups had acquired hearing losses and had been fitted with hearing aids. The subjects were assigned to three groups on the basis of hearing aid use: full-time users, part-time users, and nonusers. The amount of background noise tolerated when listening to speech was tested. The speech stimulus was a story read by a woman and set at an individually chosen most comfortable level. The maskers were a babble of voices, speech-spectrum noise, traffic noise, music, and the noise of a pneumatic drill. There was a significant interaction between groups and noises. The full-time users tolerated significantly higher levels of music and speech-spectrum noise than part-time users and nonusers. In addition, the full-time users, but not the part-time users, assessed themselves as less handicapped in everyday functions when they wore hearing aids than when they did not wear their hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2072693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  26 in total

1.  Measurement of hearing aid internal noise.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.

Authors:  H Gustav Mueller; Jennifer Weber; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

3.  An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jorge Mejia; Katrina Freeston; Richard J van Hoesel; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Predicting three-month and 12-month post-fitting real-world hearing-aid outcome using pre-fitting acceptable noise level (ANL).

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Hsu-Chueh Ho; Shih-Hsuan Hsiao; Ryan B Brummet; Octav Chipara
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Factors Affecting the Use of Speech Testing in Adult Audiology.

Authors:  Bhavisha J Parmar; Saima L Rajasingam; Jennifer K Bizley; Deborah A Vickers
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Advantages of binaural amplification to acceptable noise level of directional hearing aid users.

Authors:  Ja-Hee Kim; Jae Hee Lee; Ho-Ki Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Subjective criteria underlying noise-tolerance in the presence of speech.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Nahae Kayden Kim; Stephanie A Lockshaw; Megan N Nash
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  The relationship of speech intelligibility with hearing sensitivity, cognition, and perceived hearing difficulties varies for different speech perception tests.

Authors:  Antje Heinrich; Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16

10.  Measurement of Acceptable Noise Level with Background Music.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Ahn; Junghwa Bahng; Jae Hee Lee
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.