Literature DB >> 20726001

The natural chemopreventive phytochemical R-sulforaphane is a far more potent inducer of the carcinogen-detoxifying enzyme systems in rat liver and lung than the S-isomer.

Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis1, Renato Iori, Costas Ioannides.   

Abstract

The chemopreventive activity of the phytochemical sulforaphane, (-)1-isothiocyanato-4R-(methylsulfinyl)-butane, present in cruciferous vegetables in substantial amounts in the form of glucosinolate, was demonstrated in animal models of cancer using the racemate, despite the fact that humans are exposed only to the R-enantiomer through the diet. Since a principal mechanism of the chemopreventive activity of sulforaphane is modulation of the carcinogen-metabolising enzyme systems, a study was conducted in precision-cut rat liver and lung slices, and in FAO cells comparing the ability of R- and S-sulforaphane to modulate these enzyme systems. R-sulforaphane elevated hepatic glutathione S-transferase and quinone reductase whereas the S-enantiomer had no effect; moreover, the R-enantiomer was more effective in up-regulating GSTα, GSTμ and quinone reductase protein levels. In the lung, both enantiomers increased the same enzyme activities with the R-enantiomer being more potent; in addition, the R-enantiomer was more effective in up-regulating GSTα and quinone reductase protein levels. Both isomers increased glutathione levels in both tissues, with R-sulforaphane being more potent. Finally, R-sulforaphane was the more effective of the two isomers in up-regulating CYP1A1/1B1 apoprotein levels in both liver and lung, and CYP1A2 in the liver. Similarly, in FAO cells the R-enantiomer was far more effective in up-regulating quinone reductase and glutathione S-transferase activities and protein levels compared with the S-isomer. These studies demonstrate clearly the superiority of R-sulforaphane, when compared with the S-enantiomer, in stimulating detoxification enzymes, and raises the possibility that the animal studies that employed the racemate may have underestimated the chemopreventive activity of this isothiocyanate.
Copyright © 2010 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20726001     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  10 in total

1.  Dose-dependent effects of R-sulforaphane isothiocyanate on the biology of human mesenchymal stem cells, at dietary amounts, it promotes cell proliferation and reduces senescence and apoptosis, while at anti-cancer drug doses, it has a cytotoxic effect.

Authors:  Fulvia Zanichelli; Stefania Capasso; Marilena Cipollaro; Eleonora Pagnotta; Maria Cartenì; Fiorina Casale; Renato Iori; Umberto Galderisi
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-04-06

2.  The HSP90 Inhibitor Ganetespib Radiosensitizes Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Roberto Gomez-Casal; Chitralekha Bhattacharya; Michael W Epperly; Per H Basse; Hong Wang; Xinhui Wang; David A Proia; Joel S Greenberger; Mark A Socinski; Vera Levina
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Phytochemicals as Innovative Therapeutic Tools against Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Emanuele-Salvatore Scarpa; Paolino Ninfali
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  R-sulforaphane modulates the expression profile of AhR, ERα, Nrf2, NQO1, and GSTP in human breast cell lines.

Authors:  Barbara Licznerska; Hanna Szaefer; Violetta Krajka-Kuźniak
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Induction of the Stringent Response Underlies the Antimicrobial Action of Aliphatic Isothiocyanates.

Authors:  Dariusz Nowicki; Klaudyna Krause; Patrycja Szamborska; Adrianna Żukowska; Grzegorz M Cech; Agnieszka Szalewska-Pałasz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Sulforaphane and Its Bifunctional Analogs: Synthesis and Biological Activity.

Authors:  Łukasz Janczewski
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Immunomodulatory Effects of (R)-Sulforaphane on LPS-Activated Murine Immune Cells: Molecular Signaling Pathways and Epigenetic Changes in Histone Markers.

Authors:  Manuel Alcarranza; Isabel Villegas; Rocío Muñoz-García; Rocío Recio; Inmaculada Fernández; Catalina Alarcón-de-la-Lastra
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04

Review 8.  The Role of Brassica Bioactives on Human Health: Are We Studying It the Right Way?

Authors:  Sarai Quirante-Moya; Paula García-Ibañez; Francisco Quirante-Moya; Débora Villaño; Diego A Moreno
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Human, Animal and Plant Health Benefits of Glucosinolates and Strategies for Enhanced Bioactivity: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sylvia Maina; Gerald Misinzo; Gaymary Bakari; Ho-Youn Kim
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Sulforaphane suppresses metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer cells by targeting the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Qian Lu; Nan Li; Ming Xu; Tatsuo Miyamoto; Jing Liu
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-03-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.