Literature DB >> 20725063

Waist circumference is an independent correlate of errors in self-reported BMI.

Ruth Sullivan1, William D Johnson, Peter T Katzmarzyk.   

Abstract

Although there are issues of reporting bias surrounding the use of self-reported BMI, it is frequently the method employed to establish the prevalence of obesity. The goal of this study was to assess whether, independently of measured BMI, waist circumference (WC) was associated with the magnitude of the difference between self-reported and measured BMI within a large sample of European-American (EA) and African-American (AA) adults. Self-reported height and weight, and measured height, weight, and WC were collected on 12,809 adults (61% women, 66% EA) aged 18-65 years. Mean negative BMI differences (self-reported minus measured BMI) were identified in all race-by-sex groups (AA men: -0.55; EA men: -0.63; AA women: -0.91; EA women: -0.67). WC was negatively associated with the BMI difference such that a higher WC was associated with greater under-reporting of BMI. However, after adjusting for age and measured BMI, WC was positively associated with the BMI difference in all race-by-sex groups. These results suggest that WC could be useful in gaining an insight into people's awareness of their own body size and fatness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20725063     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  1 in total

1.  Accuracy of self-reported anthropometric measures - Findings from the Finnish Twin Study.

Authors:  J Tuomela; J Kaprio; P N Sipilä; K Silventoinen; X Wang; M Ollikainen; M Piirtola
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.