OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate, across different socioeconomic groups, the proportion of household medicine expenses that were paid by households and the proportion paid by the Brazilian national health system. METHODS: We carried out a survey in Porto Alegre, Brazil, that included 2988 individuals of all ages. We defined 2 expenditure variables: "out-of-pocket medicines value" (the sum of retail prices of all medicines used by family members within the previous 15 days and paid for out of pocket) and "free medicines value" (a similar definition for medicines obtained without charge). RESULTS: In 2003, the Brazilian national health system provided, free of charge, 78% of the monetary value of medicines reported (79% in the bottom wealth quintile and 32% in the top 2 quintiles). The mean out-of-pocket expense for medicines was 6 times greater among the top wealth quintiles compared with those in lower quintiles, but free medicines constituted a 3-times-greater proportion of potential expenditures for medicines among the bottom quintile than among the top 2 quintiles. CONCLUSIONS: Free provision of medicines seems to be saving substantial amounts of medicine expenditures for poor people in Brazil.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate, across different socioeconomic groups, the proportion of household medicine expenses that were paid by households and the proportion paid by the Brazilian national health system. METHODS: We carried out a survey in Porto Alegre, Brazil, that included 2988 individuals of all ages. We defined 2 expenditure variables: "out-of-pocket medicines value" (the sum of retail prices of all medicines used by family members within the previous 15 days and paid for out of pocket) and "free medicines value" (a similar definition for medicines obtained without charge). RESULTS: In 2003, the Brazilian national health system provided, free of charge, 78% of the monetary value of medicines reported (79% in the bottom wealth quintile and 32% in the top 2 quintiles). The mean out-of-pocket expense for medicines was 6 times greater among the top wealth quintiles compared with those in lower quintiles, but free medicines constituted a 3-times-greater proportion of potential expenditures for medicines among the bottom quintile than among the top 2 quintiles. CONCLUSIONS: Free provision of medicines seems to be saving substantial amounts of medicine expenditures for poor people in Brazil.
Authors: Paulo Sérgio Dourado Arrais; Luciara Leite Brito; Maurício Lima Barreto; Helena Lutéscia L Coelho Journal: Cad Saude Publica Date: 2006-01-09 Impact factor: 1.632
Authors: Marina Guimarães Lima; Andréia Queiroz Ribeiro; Francisco de Assis Acurcio; Suely Rozenfeld; Carlos Henrique Klein Journal: Cad Saude Publica Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 1.632
Authors: Andréa D Bertoldi; Aluísio J D Barros; Anita Wagner; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Pedro C Hallal Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi; Ana Paula Helfer; Aline L Camargo; Noêmia U L Tavares; Panos Kanavos Journal: Global Health Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 4.185