Literature DB >> 20724503

Evaluation of the specificity and effectiveness of selected oral hygiene actives in salivary biofilm microcosms.

Ruth G Ledder1, Prem K Sreenivasan2, William DeVizio2, Andrew J McBain1.   

Abstract

The microbiological effects of biocidal products used for the enhancement of oral hygiene relate to the active compound(s) as well as other formulation components. Here, we test the specificities of selected actives in the absence of multiple excipients. Salivary ecosystems were maintained in tissue culture plate-based hydroxyapatite disc models (HDMs) and modified drip-flow biofilm reactors (MDFRs). Test compounds stannous fluoride (SF), SDS, triclosan (TCS), zinc lactate (ZL) and ZL with SF in combination (ZLSF) were delivered to the HDMs once and four times daily for 6 days to MDFRs. Plaques were characterized by differential viable counting and PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). TCS and SDS were the most effective compounds against HDM plaques, significantly reducing total viable counts (P<0.05), whilst SF, ZL and ZLSF were comparatively ineffective. TCS exhibited specificity for streptococci (P<0.01) and Gram-negative anaerobes (P<0.01) following a single dosing and also on repeated dosing in MDFRs. In contrast to single exposures, multiple dosing with ZLSF also significantly reduced all bacterial groups, whilst SF and ZL caused significant but transient reductions. According to PCR-DGGE analyses, significant (P<0.05) reductions in eubacterial diversity occurred following 6 day dosing with both TCS and ZLSF. Concordance of MDFR eubacterial profiles with salivary inocula ranged between 58 and 97%. TCS and ZL(SF) exhibited similar specificities to those reported for formulations. TCS was the most potent antibacterial, after single and multiple dosage regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20724503     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.024372-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  9 in total

1.  Biofilm community diversity after exposure to 0·4% stannous fluoride gels.

Authors:  C Reilly; K Rasmussen; T Selberg; J Stevens; R S Jones
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Bacteriological effects of dentifrices with and without active ingredients of natural origin.

Authors:  Ruth G Ledder; Joe Latimer; Gavin J Humphreys; Prem K Sreenivasan; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Biofilm-Growing Bacteria: Current and Emerging Methods.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Bonaventura; Arianna Pompilio
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  Dental Biofilm and Laboratory Microbial Culture Models for Cariology Research.

Authors:  Ollie Yiru Yu; Irene Shuping Zhao; May Lei Mei; Edward Chin-Man Lo; Chun-Hung Chu
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-19

5.  Visualization and Quantification of the Oral Hygiene Effects of Brushing, Dentifrice Use, and Brush Wear Using a Tooth Brushing Simulator.

Authors:  Ruth G Ledder; Joe Latimer; Sarah Forbes; Jodie L Penney; Prem K Sreenivasan; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-05-08

6.  A commercial SnF2 toothpaste formulation reduces simulated human plaque biofilm in a dynamic typodont model.

Authors:  Yalda Khosravi; Sara Palmer; Carlo A Daep; Karthik Sambanthamoorthy; Purnima Kumar; Devendra H Dusane; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 4.059

7.  In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Victor Quintas; Isabel Prada-López; María J Carreira; David Suárez-Quintanilla; Carlos Balsa-Castro; Inmaculada Tomás
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Anti-Bacteria and Microecosystem-Regulating Effects of Dental Implant Coated with Dimethylaminododecyl Methacrylate.

Authors:  Bolei Li; Yang Ge; Yao Wu; Jing Chen; Hockin H K Xu; Minggang Yang; Mingyun Li; Biao Ren; Mingye Feng; Michael D Weir; Xian Peng; Lei Cheng; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  In vitro activity of biofilm inhibitors in combination with antibacterial drugs against extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Qin Peng; Fei Lin; Baodong Ling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.