Literature DB >> 20724393

Incidence and types of non-ideal care events in an emergency department.

Kendall K Hall1, Stephen M Schenkel, Jon Mark Hirshon, Yan Xiao, Gary A Noskin.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify and characterise hazardous conditions in an Emergency Department (ED) using active surveillance.
METHODS: This study was conducted in an urban, academic, tertiary care medical centre ED with over 45,000 annual adult visits. Trained research assistants interviewed care givers at the discharge of a systematically sampled group of patient visits across all shifts and days of the week. Care givers were asked to describe any part of the patient's care that they considered to be 'not ideal.' Reports were categorised by the segment of emergency care in which the event occurred and by a broad event category and specific event type. The occurrence of harm was also determined.
RESULTS: Surveillance was conducted for 656 h with 487 visits sampled, representing 15% of total visits. A total of 1180 care giver interviews were completed (29 declines), generating 210 non-duplicative event reports for 153 visits. Thirty-two per cent of the visits had at least one non-ideal care event. Segments of care with the highest percentage of events were: Diagnostic Testing (29%), Disposition (21%), Evaluation (18%) and Treatment (14%). Process-related delays were the most frequently reported events within the categories of medication delivery (53%), laboratory testing (88%) and radiology testing (79%). Fourteen (7%) of the reported events were associated with patient harm.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of non-ideal care events occurred during ED visits and involved failures in medication delivery, radiology testing and laboratory testing processes, and resulted in delays and patient harm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20724393     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2010.040246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  5 in total

1.  Application of human factors to improve usability of clinical decision support for diagnostic decision-making: a scenario-based simulation study.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Megan Salwei; Douglas Wiegmann; Roger L Brown; Peter Kleinschmidt; Clair Novak; Michael Pulia; Yudi Wang; Emily Wirkus; Brian Patterson
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Clinical decision-making by the emergency department resident physicians for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Tengda Xu; Jun Xu; Xuezhong Yu; Sui Ma; Zhong Wang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Cross-checking to reduce adverse events resulting from medical errors in the emergency department: study protocol of the CHARMED cluster randomized study.

Authors:  Yonathan Freund; Alexandra Rousseau; Laurence Berard; Helene Goulet; Patrick Ray; Benjamin Bloom; Tabassome Simon; Bruno Riou
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-04

Review 4.  Adverse events related to emergency department care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Antonia S Stang; Aireen S Wingert; Lisa Hartling; Amy C Plint
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Preparing Emergency Medicine Residents to Disclose Medical Error Using Standardized Patients.

Authors:  Carmen N Spalding; Sherri L Rudinsky
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.