Literature DB >> 20724380

Conservation and evolution in and among SRF- and MEF2-type MADS domains and their binding sites.

Wenwu Wu1, Xiaotai Huang, Jian Cheng, Zhenggang Li, Stefan de Folter, Zhuoran Huang, Xiaoqian Jiang, Hongxia Pang, Shiheng Tao.   

Abstract

Serum response factor (SRF) and myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) represent two types of members of the MCM1, AGAMOUS, DEFICIENS, and SRF (MADS)-box transcription factor family present in animals and fungi. Each type has distinct biological functions, which are reflected by the distinct specificities of the proteins bound to their cognate DNA-binding sites and activated by their respective cofactors. However, little is known about the evolution of MADS domains and their DNA-binding sites. Here, we report on the conservation and evolution of the two types of MADS domains with their cognate DNA-binding sites by using phylogenetic analyses. First, there are great similarities between the two types of proteins with amino acid positions highly conserved, which are critical for binding to the DNA sequence and for the maintenance of the 3D structure. Second, in contrast to MEF2-type MADS domains, distinct conserved residues are present at some positions in SRF-type MADS domains, determining specificity and the configuration of the MADS domain bound to DNA sequences. Furthermore, the ancestor sequence of SRF- and MEF2-type MADS domains is more similar to MEF2-type MADS domains than to SRF-type MADS domains. In the case of DNA-binding sites, the MEF2 site has a T-rich core in one DNA sequence and an A-rich core in the reverse sequence as compared with the SRF site, no matter whether where either A or T is present in the two complementary sequences. In addition, comparing SRF sites in the human and the mouse genomes reveals that the evolution rate of CArG-boxes is faster in mouse than in human. Moreover, interestingly, a CArG-like sequence, which is probably functionless, could potentially mutate to a functional CArG-box that can be bound by SRF and vice versa. Together, these results significantly improve our knowledge on the conservation and evolution of the MADS domains and their binding sites to date and provide new insights to investigate the MADS family, which is not only on evolution of MADS factors but also on evolution of their binding sites and even on coevolution of MADS factors with their binding sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20724380     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  10 in total

1.  Smooth muscle calponin: an unconventional CArG-dependent gene that antagonizes neointimal formation.

Authors:  Xiaochun Long; Orazio J Slivano; Sarah L Cowan; Mary A Georger; Ting-Hein Lee; Joseph M Miano
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  Inositol phosphate multikinase dependent transcriptional control.

Authors:  Ace J Hatch; Audrey R Odom; John D York
Journal:  Adv Biol Regul       Date:  2017-03-21

3.  Variable paralog expression underlies phenotype variation.

Authors:  Raisa Bailon-Zambrano; Juliana Sucharov; Abigail Mumme-Monheit; Matthew Murry; Amanda Stenzel; Anthony T Pulvino; Jennyfer M Mitchell; Kathryn L Colborn; James T Nichols
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Chromosome-scale assembly and annotation of the perennial ryegrass genome.

Authors:  Istvan Nagy; Elisabeth Veeckman; Chang Liu; Michiel Van Bel; Klaas Vandepoele; Christian Sig Jensen; Tom Ruttink; Torben Asp
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.547

5.  Steroid receptor coactivator-2 is a dual regulator of cardiac transcription factor function.

Authors:  Erin L Reineke; Ashley Benham; Benjamin Soibam; Erin Stashi; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Mark L Entman; Robert J Schwartz; Bert W O'Malley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Functional conservation of MIKC*-Type MADS box genes in Arabidopsis and rice pollen maturation.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Shaojie Cui; Feng Wu; Shuo Yan; Xuelei Lin; Xiaoqiu Du; Kang Chong; Susanne Schilling; Günter Theißen; Zheng Meng
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Vertebrate paralogous MEF2 genes: origin, conservation, and evolution.

Authors:  Wenwu Wu; Stefan de Folter; Xia Shen; Wenqian Zhang; Shiheng Tao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Identification and characterization of a Mef2 transcriptional activator in schistosome parasites.

Authors:  John N Milligan; Emmitt R Jolly
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-01-03

Review 9.  Regulators of plant biomass degradation in ascomycetous fungi.

Authors:  Tiziano Benocci; Maria Victoria Aguilar-Pontes; Miaomiao Zhou; Bernhard Seiboth; Ronald P de Vries
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  The study of two barley type I-like MADS-box genes as potential targets of epigenetic regulation during seed development.

Authors:  Aliki Kapazoglou; Cawas Engineer; Vicky Drosou; Chrysanthi Kalloniati; Eleni Tani; Aphrodite Tsaballa; Evangelia D Kouri; Ioannis Ganopoulos; Emmanouil Flemetakis; Athanasios S Tsaftaris
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.215

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.