Literature DB >> 20724358

Standard audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 measurement procedure.

Nikolai Bisgaard1, Marcel S M G Vlaming, Martin Dahlquist.   

Abstract

For the characterization of hearing aids, a new test method has been defined in the new International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard 60118-15. For this characterization, the hearing aid will be set to actual user settings as programmed by standard fitting software from the hearing aid manufacturer. To limit the variation of programming outcomes, 10 standard audiograms, which cover the entire range of audiograms met in clinical practice, have been defined. This article describes how the set of standard audiograms has been developed. This set of standard audiogram has been derived by a vector quantization analysis method on a database of 28,244 audiograms. Using this analysis method, sets of typical audiograms have been obtained of sizes 12 and 60. It turned out that the smaller set could not be used for selecting audiograms as sloping audiograms were absent. Therefore, the larger set has been analyzed to provide seven standard audiograms for flat and moderately sloping hearing loss and three standard audiograms for steep hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20724358      PMCID: PMC4111352          DOI: 10.1177/1084713810379609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  35 in total

1.  Limitations of the Envelope Difference Index as a Metric for Nonlinear Distortion in Hearing Aids.

Authors:  James M Kates
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  [Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].

Authors:  C Dörfler; T Hocke; A Hast; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Melinda C Anderson; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Lewis O Harvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Gregory Ellis; Kendra Marks; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Emily M H Lundberg; Song Hui Chon; James M Kates; Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Comparison of Behavioral and Physiological Measures of the Status of the Cochlear Nonlinearity.

Authors:  Michal Fereczkowski; Torsten Dau; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Primed to die: an investigation of the genetic mechanisms underlying noise-induced hearing loss and cochlear damage in homozygous Foxo3-knockout mice.

Authors:  Holly J Beaulac; Felicia Gilels; Jingyuan Zhang; Sarah Jeoung; Patricia M White
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 8.469

8.  Influence of Three Auditory Profiles on Aided Speech Perception in Different Noise Scenarios.

Authors:  Mengfan Wu; Oscar M Cañete; Jesper Hvass Schmidt; Michal Fereczkowski; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Reliability of real ear insertion gain in behind-the-ear hearing aids with different coupling systems to the ear canal.

Authors:  Charlotte Thunberg Jespersen; Kimi Nina Møller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Electroacoustic Comparison of Hearing Aid Output of Phonemes in Running Speech versus Isolation: Implications for Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Testing.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; David W Purcell; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.