Literature DB >> 20723948

Insufficient sensitivity of hemoglobin A(₁C) determination in diagnosis or screening of early diabetic states.

Stefan S Fajans1, William H Herman, Elif A Oral.   

Abstract

An International Expert Committee made recommendations for using the hemoglobin A(₁C) (A1C) assay as the preferred method for the diagnosis of diabetes in nonpregnant individuals. A concentration of at least 6.5% was considered as diagnostic. It is the aim of this study to compare the sensitivity of A1C with that of plasma glucose concentrations in subjects with early diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). We chose 2 groups of subjects who had A1C not exceeding 6.4%. The first group of 89 subjects had family histories of diabetes (MODY or type 2 diabetes mellitus) and had oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and A1C determinations. They included 36 subjects with diabetes or IGT and 53 with normal OGTT. The second group of 58 subjects was screened for diabetes in our Diabetes Clinic by fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose, or OGTT and A1C; and similar comparisons were made. Subjects with diabetes or IGT, including those with fasting hyperglycemia, had A1C ranging from 5.0% to 6.4% (mean, 5.8%). The subjects with normal OGTT had A1C of 4.2% to 6.3% (mean, 5.4%), or 5.5% for the 2 groups. The A1C may be in the normal range in subjects with diabetes or IGT, including those with fasting hyperglycemia. Approximately one third of subjects with early diabetes and IGT have A1C less than 5.7%, the cut point that the American Diabetes Association recommends as indicating the onset of risk of developing diabetes in the future. The results of our study are similar to those obtained by a large Dutch epidemiologic study. If our aim is to recognize early diabetic states to apply effective prophylactic procedures to prevent or delay progression to more severe diabetes, A1C is not sufficiently sensitive or reliable for diagnosis of diabetes or IGT. A combination of A1C and plasma glucose determinations, where necessary, is recommended for diagnosis or screening of diabetes or IGT. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723948      PMCID: PMC2998594          DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  22 in total

1.  Diabetes epidemiology: guiding clinical and public health practice: the Kelly West Award Lecture, 2006.

Authors:  William H Herman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Utility of A1C for diabetes screening in the 1999 2004 NHANES population.

Authors:  Catherine Buell; Duclie Kermah; Mayer B Davidson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 17.152

5.  Counterpoint: Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Mathew Sermer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.152

Review 6.  A new look at screening and diagnosing diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Christopher D Saudek; William H Herman; David B Sacks; Richard M Bergenstal; David Edelman; Mayer B Davidson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors:  William H Herman; Yong Ma; Gabriel Uwaifo; Steven Haffner; Steven E Kahn; Edward S Horton; John M Lachin; Maria G Montez; Tina Brenneman; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  The combination of fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin predicts type 2 diabetes in Japanese workers.

Authors:  Kazuo Inoue; Masatoshi Matsumoto; Yasuki Kobayashi
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.602

9.  Point: Universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Robert G Moses; N Wah Cheung
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.152

10.  Relationship between A1C and glucose levels in the general Dutch population: the new Hoorn study.

Authors:  Esther van 't Riet; Marjan Alssema; Josina M Rijkelijkhuizen; Piet J Kostense; Giel Nijpels; Jacqueline M Dekker
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  14 in total

1.  PERFORMANCE OF A1C VERSUS OGTT FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PREDIABETES IN A COMMUNITY-BASED SCREENING.

Authors:  Jenny E Camacho; Vallabh O Shah; Ronald Schrader; Craig S Wong; Mark R Burge
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Fasting Plasma Glucose and the HbA1c Are Not Optimal Screening Modalities for the Diagnosis of New Diabetes in Previously Undiagnosed Asian Indian Community Participants.

Authors:  Rosaley Prakaschandra; Datshanna Prakesh Naidoo
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 3.  Implications of using hemoglobin A1C for diagnosing diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Samir Malkani; John P Mordes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Comparing glucose and hemoglobin A1c diagnostic tests among a high metabolic risk Hispanic population.

Authors:  Mónica A Vega-Vázquez; Margarita Ramírez-Vick; Francisco J Muñoz-Torres; Loida A González-Rodríguez; Kaumudi Joshipura
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.876

5.  Detecting prediabetes among Hispanics/Latinos from diverse heritage groups: Does the test matter? Findings from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

Authors:  M Larissa Avilés-Santa; Cynthia M Pérez; Neil Schneiderman; Peter J Savage; Robert C Kaplan; Yanping Teng; Erick L Suárez; Jianwen Cai; Aida L Giachello; Gregory A Talavera; Catherine C Cowie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 6.  MODY: history, genetics, pathophysiology, and clinical decision making.

Authors:  Stefan S Fajans; Graeme I Bell
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Significance of HbA1c and its measurement in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: US experience.

Authors:  Deborah Taira Juarez; Kendra M Demaris; Roy Goo; Christina Louise Mnatzaganian; Helen Wong Smith
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Comparison of the Current Diagnostic Criterion of HbA1c with Fasting and 2-Hour Plasma Glucose Concentration.

Authors:  Rudruidee Karnchanasorn; Jean Huang; Horng-Yih Ou; Wei Feng; Lee-Ming Chuang; Ken C Chiu; Raynald Samoa
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.011

9.  Plasma glycemic measures and fecundability in a Singapore preconception cohort study.

Authors:  See Ling Loy; Chee Wai Ku; Ada En Qi Lai; Xin Hui Choo; Angela Hui Min Ho; Yin Bun Cheung; Keith M Godfrey; Yap-Seng Chong; Peter D Gluckman; Lynette Pei-Chi Shek; Kok Hian Tan; Fabian Kok Peng Yap; Shiao-Yng Chan; Jerry Kok Yen Chan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Use of glucometer and fasting blood glucose as screening tools for diabetes mellitus type 2 and glycated haemoglobin as clinical reference in rural community primary care settings of a middle income country.

Authors:  Benja Muktabhant; Pattara Sanchaisuriya; Pongdech Sarakarn; Worawitaya Tawityanon; Mantana Trakulwong; Songsri Worawat; Frank P Schelp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.