Literature DB >> 20723940

Outcome of primary versus deferred radical prostatectomy in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden Follow-Up Study.

Benny Holmström1, Erik Holmberg, Lars Egevad, Jan Adolfsson, Jan-Erik Johansson, Jonas Hugosson, Pär Stattin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed outcomes in terms of adverse pathology and prostate cancer specific mortality in men who underwent primary or deferred radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden Follow-Up Study men 70 years old or younger at diagnosis with localized low to intermediate risk prostate cancer diagnosed from 1997 to 2002 were identified. Outcome in terms of adverse pathology, namely upgrading of Gleason score, positive surgical margins and extraprostatic extension, as well as prostate cancer specific mortality, was assessed in 2,344 men who underwent primary radical prostatectomy and 222 who underwent deferred radical prostatectomy after an initial period of surveillance.
RESULTS: Upgrading of Gleason score in surgical specimens vs core biopsies was less frequent after primary (25%) vs deferred radical prostatectomy (38%), p <0.001. There was no significant difference in the percentage of men who underwent primary vs deferred radical prostatectomy for positive surgical margins (33% vs 24%) or extraprostatic extension (27% vs 25%), and there was no difference in any 1 or more of the 3 adverse pathology features (55% vs 56%). After a median followup of 8 years 0.7% of men in the primary radical prostatectomy group and 0.9% in the deferred radical prostatectomy group had died of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the presence of any 1 or more adverse pathology features or in prostate cancer specific mortality after primary compared to deferred radical prostatectomy. However, longer followup is needed to conclusively evaluate the role of deferred radical prostatectomy.
Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723940     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

Review 1.  Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Characteristics of modern Gleason 9/10 prostate adenocarcinoma: a single tertiary centre experience within the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; S Elamin; A Cahill; P Aherne; J White; J Buckley; K N O'Regan; A Brady; D G Power; M F O'Brien; P Sweeney; N Mayer; P J Kelly
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Pathological outcomes of Japanese men eligible for active surveillance after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Inoue; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Hidekazu Inui; Yoshihiro Komai; Masayuki Nakagawa; Naoki Oguchi; Gen Kawa; Motohiko Sugi; Chisato Ohe; Chika Miyasaka; Yorika Nakano; Noriko Sakaida; Yoshiko Uemura; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The impact of delaying radical nephrectomy for stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect patient pathological outcome? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Kelsey Lawson; Mounsif Azizi; Emad Rajih; Abdullah Alenizi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Malek Meskawi; Cedric Lebacle; Thierry Lebeau; Serge Benayoun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Is time from diagnosis to radical prostatectomy associated with oncological outcomes?

Authors:  Kirsti Aas; Sophie Dorothea Fosså; Rune Kvåle; Bjørn Møller; Tor Åge Myklebust; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Stig Müller; Viktor Berge
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Timing of curative treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Peter C Albertsen; Chris H Bangma; Stephen J Freedland; Markus Graefen; Andrew Vickers; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Immediate versus delayed prostatectomy: Nationwide population-based study (.).

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Yasin Folkvaljon; David Robinson; Danil V Makarov; Ola Bratt; Hans Garmo; Pär Stattin
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.612

10.  Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Khaled Ajib; Kelsey Lawson; Mounsif Azizi; Emad Rajih; Abdullah Alenizi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Côme Tolmier; Malek Meskawi; Fred Saad; Raisa S Pompe; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.