Literature DB >> 20723936

Renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy with extended ischemic intervals are better than after radical nephrectomy.

Brian R Lane1, Amr F Fergany, Christopher J Weight, Steven C Campbell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy is now a standard of care for clinical stage T1 renal cancers amenable to a nephron sparing approach. Based on tumor size and location, some partial nephrectomies can be more challenging and necessitate longer ischemic intervals, and radical nephrectomy is considered an alternative standard of care for these tumors. We evaluate whether partial nephrectomy with extended ischemia provides improved renal functional outcomes compared with radical nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Renal functional outcomes were analyzed in 2,402 consecutive patients with serum creatinine 1.4 mg/dl or less and 2 functioning kidneys treated for cT1 renal cancer at Cleveland Clinic with partial (1,833, 76%) or radical nephrectomy (569, 24%). Patients treated with partial nephrectomy were grouped according to duration of ischemia using the categories of limited (less than 30 minutes), unknown or extended (greater than 30 minutes).
RESULTS: Patients in all 4 groups had similar preoperative creatinine (median 0.9 mg/dl) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (median 82 to 84 ml/minute/1.73 m(2)). Patients undergoing radical nephrectomy on average were older, and had more comorbidities and larger tumors (p <0.001). Regardless of type of surgery, this cohort as a whole was at low risk (less than 1%) for renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 15 ml/minute/1.73 m(2)). However, patients in the radical nephrectomy cohort were far more likely (p <0.001) to have an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 45 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) (35%) than any of the partial nephrectomy groups (limited 11%, unknown 15%, extended ischemia 19%).
CONCLUSIONS: Even when performed with extended ischemia, partial nephrectomy is associated with renal functional outcomes superior to those of radical nephrectomy for clinical stage T1 renal cancers. Partial nephrectomy should be considered even for tumors in which anticipated ischemia may exceed 30 minutes.
Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723936     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Laser now also to be used in organ-preserving kidney surgery?].

Authors:  H Loertzer; P Schneider; P Thelen; R H Ringert; A Strauß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raouf Seyam; Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; Waleed M Altaweel; Rodney Davis; Nabil K Bissada
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Risk of chronic kidney disease after cancer nephrectomy.

Authors:  Lin Li; Wei Ling Lau; Connie M Rhee; Kevin Harley; Csaba P Kovesdy; John J Sim; Steve Jacobsen; Anthony Chang; Jaime Landman; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Renal Functional Outcomes after Surgery, Ablation, and Active Surveillance of Localized Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Mohamad E Allaf; Eric B Bass; Stephen M Sozio
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Stefanie Schmidt; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Arkadiusz Miernik; Philipp Dahm; Anne Cleves; Mario Walther; Nils Kroeger
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-09

Review 6.  Management of Renal Masses and Localized Renal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; Hiten D Patel; Stephen M Sozio; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Use of nephron-sparing surgery among renal cell carcinoma patients with diabetes and hypertension.

Authors:  Christopher P Filson; Kendra Schwartz; Joanne S Colt; Julie Ruterbusch; W Marston Linehan; Wong-Ho Chow; David C Miller
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Do we know (or just believe) that partial nephrectomy leads to better survival than radical nephrectomy for renal cancer?

Authors:  Conrad M Tobert; Christopher B Riedinger; Brian R Lane
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a marker of acute kidney injury after kidney surgery.

Authors:  Preston C Sprenkle; James Wren; Alexandra C Maschino; Andrew Feifer; Nicholas Power; Tarek Ghoneim; Itay Sternberg; Martin Fleisher; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Characterization of mild and severe post-radical nephrectomy renal functional deterioration utilizing histopathological evaluation of non-neoplastic nephrectomized renal parenchyma.

Authors:  Takehiro Sejima; Tetsuya Yumioka; Noriya Yamaguchi; Hideto Iwamoto; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Masashi Honda; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.