Literature DB >> 20723835

Measuring and monitoring radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided procedures.

John W Jaco1, Donald L Miller.   

Abstract

The principal problem in measuring patient radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided procedures is that dose is not administered uniformly throughout the patient's body. Four dose metrics have been developed to quantify patient radiation dose for fluoroscopically guided procedures: fluoroscopy time, peak skin dose, reference dose, and kerma-area-product. Each metric must be understood to be used appropriately. Fluoroscopy time correlates poorly with other dose metrics. It should not be used as the sole method to estimate, monitor, or record patient radiation dose unless no alternative is available. Kerma-area-product is a good metric for estimating stochastic risk. Reference dose is a conservative method to estimate peak skin dose and deterministic risk and is recommended for this purpose. Every fluoroscope sold in the USA since mid 2006 is able to measure, display, and record reference dose. Radiation dose should be monitored during fluoroscopically guided procedures, either by the operator or by a designated individual in the procedure room, such as a technologist or nurse. Patient radiation dose should be recorded appropriately in the medical record. Patients who have received a sufficiently large radiation dose should have follow-up at 10-14 days and at 1 month after the procedure for possible deterministic effects. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723835     DOI: 10.1053/j.tvir.2010.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1557-9808


  7 in total

1.  Real-time eye lens dose monitoring during cerebral angiography procedures.

Authors:  M J Safari; J H D Wong; K A A Kadir; N K Thorpe; D L Cutajar; M Petasecca; M L F Lerch; A B Rosenfeld; K H Ng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Development of Diagnostic Reference Levels Using a Real-Time Radiation Dose Monitoring System at a Cardiovascular Center in Korea.

Authors:  Jungsu Kim; Deoknam Seo; Inseok Choi; Sora Nam; Yongsu Yoon; Hyunji Kim; Jae Her; Seonggyu Han; Soonmu Kwon; Hunsik Park; Dongheon Yang; Jungmin Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  The eye of the endourologist: what are the risks? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Marie Audouin; Luca Villa; Maria Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero; Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  THE EFFECTS OF CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING GUIDANCE ON PATIENT RADIATION EXPOSURES IN TRANS-ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLISATION FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA.

Authors:  S Y Wong; S Foley; C P Cantwell; R Ryan; J Lucey; P Maher; J P McNulty
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Predictors of radiation exposure to providers during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  David L Wenzler; Joel E Abbott; Jeannie J Su; William Shi; Richard Slater; Daniel Miller; Michelle J Siemens; Roger L Sur
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

6.  Aegrescit medendo: orthopedic disability in electrophysiology - call for fluoroscopy elimination-review and commentary.

Authors:  Donald S Rubenstein; Benjamin B Holmes; Joseph A Manfredi; Matthew S McKillop; Peter C Netzler; Chad C Ward
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Analysis of radiation risk to patients from intra-operative use of the mobile X-ray system (C-arm).

Authors:  Yang-Sub Lee; Hae-Kag Lee; Jae-Hwan Cho; Ham-Gyum Kim
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.852

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.