Literature DB >> 20723649

Echocardiographic predictors for persistent functional mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

Yoshiki Matsumura1, A Marc Gillinov, Manatomo Toyono, Hiroki Oe, Tetsuhiro Yamano, Kunitsugu Takasaki, Roberto M Saraiva, Takahiro Shiota.   

Abstract

Moderate functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) is often left unaddressed at the time of aortic valve replacement (AVR) because it is expected to decrease after AVR. However, some patients have persistent moderate MR after AVR. We sought to determine the preoperative echocardiographic predictor for persistent functional MR after AVR in patients with AS. Pre- and postoperative echocardiograms were reviewed in 110 patients with severe AS and functional MR who underwent AVR without mitral valve (MV) surgery. Fifty-eight patients received concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In patients with MV tenting, defined as apical displacement of mitral leaflets in the apical 4-chamber view, MV tenting area and tenting height were measured at midsystole. Eighty patients had MV tenting (mean MV tenting area 1.4 +/- 0.5 cm(2), mean MV tenting height 0.8 +/- 0.2 cm) and 30 did not have it before AVR. MR severity decreased in 51 of 80 patients (64%) with MV tenting after AVR and in 25 of 30 patients (83%) without MV tenting (p <0.05). In patients with MV tenting, multivariate analysis revealed that presence of long-term atrial fibrillation and MV tenting area were independent predictors of postoperative MR severity (all p values <0.05). The sensitivity and specificity in predicting persistent moderate MR after AVR were 72% and 82% for MV tenting area >1.4 cm(2). In conclusion, preoperative MV tenting predicts persistent functional MR after AVR in patients with severe AS. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723649     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Echocardiographic changes after aortic valve replacement: Does the failure rate of mitral valve change?

Authors:  Arezoo Khosravi; Hadi Sheykhloo; Reza Karbasi-Afshar; Amin Saburi
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2015-03

2.  Is isolated aortic valve replacement sufficient to treat concomitant moderate functional mitral regurgitation? A propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Robert A Sorabella; Anna Olds; Halit Yerebakan; Dua Hassan; Michael A Borger; Michael Argenziano; Craig R Smith; Isaac George
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Change in Functional Moderate Mitral Regurgitation after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Weitie Wang; Tiance Wang; Hulin Piao; Bo Li; Yong Wang; Dan Li; Zhicheng Zhu; Rihao Xu; Kexiang Liu
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-12-01

Review 4.  The Prospects of Secondary Moderate Mitral Regurgitation after Aortic Valve Replacement -Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ilija Bilbija; Milos Matkovic; Marko Cubrilo; Nemanja Aleksic; Jelena Milin Lazovic; Jelena Cumic; Vladimir Tutus; Marko Jovanovic; Svetozar Putnik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Impact of mitral geometry and global afterload on improvement of mitral regurgitation after trans-catheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Y Tayyareci; R Dworakowski; P Kogoj; J Reiken; C Kenny; P MacCarthy; O Wendler; M J Monaghan
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2016-07-25

6.  Mid-term effect of balloon aortic valvuloplasty on mitral regurgitation in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Ryota Masaki; Masamichi Iwasaki; Hidekazu Tanaka; Tomoyo Hamana; Susumu Odajima; Wataru Fujimoto; Koji Kuroda; Yutaka Hatani; Takumi Inoue; Hiroshi Okamoto; Masanori Okuda; Takatoshi Hayashi; Ken-Ichi Hirata
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.062

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.