Literature DB >> 20723643

Relation of QRS width in healthy persons to risk of future permanent pacemaker implantation.

Susan Cheng1, Martin G Larson, Michelle J Keyes, Elizabeth L McCabe, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Daniel Levy, Emelia J Benjamin, Ramachandran S Vasan, Thomas J Wang.   

Abstract

In the setting of acute myocardial infarction, prolongation of the QRS interval on electrocardiography identifies patients at risk for needing permanent pacemaker implantation. However, the implications of prolonged QRS intervals in healthy subjects are unclear, especially given that the QRS prolongation encountered in this setting is typically mild. The aim of this study was to assess the relation between QRS duration and incident pacemaker implantation in a community-based cohort of 8,311 subjects (mean age 54 years, 55% women) who attended 17,731 routine examinations with resting 12-lead electrocardiography. QRS duration was analyzed as a continuous and a categorical variable (<100, 100 to <120, and > or =120 ms). During up to 35 years of follow-up, 157 participants (56 women) developed need for permanent pacemakers. In multivariable Cox regression models adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors and previous myocardial infarction or heart failure, mild QRS prolongation was associated with a threefold risk for pacemaker implantation (adjusted hazard ratio 2.90, 95% confidence interval 1.81 to 4.66, p <0.0001), and bundle branch block was associated with a fourfold risk for pacemaker implantation (hazard ratio 4.43, 95% confidence interval 2.94 to 6.68, p <0.0001). Each standard deviation increment in QRS duration (11 ms) was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.18, p <0.0001) for pacemaker placement. This association remained significant after excluding subjects with QRS durations > or =120 ms. In conclusion, subjects with prolonged QRS durations, even without bundle branch block, are at increased risk for future pacemaker implantation. Such individuals may warrant monitoring for progressive conduction disease. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723643      PMCID: PMC3012354          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  22 in total

1.  ETIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF BILATERAL BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK IN RELATION TO COMPLETE HEART BLOCK.

Authors:  J LENEGRE
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 2.  THE PATHOLOGY OF COMPLETE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK.

Authors:  M LEV
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 8.194

3.  ANATOMIC BASIS FOR ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK.

Authors:  M LEV
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  T R DAWBER; G F MEADORS; F E MOORE
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1951-03

Review 5.  Right bundle branch block: varying electrocardiographic patterns. Aetiological correlation, mechanisms and electrophysiology.

Authors:  A K Agarwal; P Venugopalan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1999-09-30       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  A clinicopathological study on 25 cases of complete left bundle branch block.

Authors:  M Sugiura; K Hiraoka; S Ohkawa; K Ueda; A Toku
Journal:  Jpn Heart J       Date:  1979-03

7.  The etiology and natural history of sinus node disorders.

Authors:  M I Ferrer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1982-02

8.  The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 2. Indications for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion.

Authors:  M C Hindman; G S Wagner; M JaRo; J M Atkins; M M Scheinman; R W DeSanctis; A H Hutter; L Yeatman; M Rubenfire; C Pujura; M Rubin; J J Morris
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; M Feinleib; P M McNamara; R J Garrison; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Criteria for intraventricular conduction disturbances and pre-excitation. World Health Organizational/International Society and Federation for Cardiology Task Force Ad Hoc.

Authors:  J L Willems; E O Robles de Medina; R Bernard; P Coumel; C Fisch; D Krikler; N A Mazur; F L Meijler; L Mogensen; P Moret
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in heart failure: the growing evidence for all or Primum non nocere for some?

Authors:  Khang-Li Looi; Nigel Lever; Anthony Tang; Sharad Agarwal
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Association between obesity and ECG variables in children and adolescents: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Guo-Zhe Sun; Yang Li; Xing-Hu Zhou; Xiao-Fan Guo; Xin-Gang Zhang; Li-Qiang Zheng; Yuan Li; Yun-DI Jiao; Ying-Xian Sun
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Clinical profile and prognostic factors of alcoholic cardiomyopathy in tribal and non-tribal population.

Authors:  Ajit Dundung; Abhinav Kumar; Rishi Tuhin Guria; Mukul Preetam; Ruth K Tara; Bindey Kumar; Mohammad Kamal Saba
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-11

4.  Long-term cardiovascular risks associated with an elevated heart rate: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ho; Martin G Larson; Anahita Ghorbani; Susan Cheng; Erin E Coglianese; Ramachandran S Vasan; Thomas J Wang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  The Prognostic Factors of Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy: A single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Fang; Rong Luo; Yibin Tang; Wei Hua; Michael Fu; Weizhong Chen; Li Lai; Xiaoping Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.