Literature DB >> 20723082

Submammary pacemakers and ICDs in women: long-term follow-up and patient satisfaction.

Michael C Giudici1, Jacqueline I Carlson, Roselyn K Krupa, Cynthia J Meierbachtol, Kent J Vanwhy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Device placement in women has unique considerations not addressed with standard implant techniques. These may include irritation and discomfort from purse and/or bra straps, changes in body image, and cosmetic issues with visible scars. Submammary device placement (SMI) addresses these problems and may be associated with greater patient comfort, cosmesis, and device acceptance. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Over a 9-year period, 51 women, mean age 47 years (range 13-70 years), underwent submammary device implantation at our institution. These included seven cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, 26 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and 18 pacemakers. Devices had been implanted for a mean of 57 months (range 2-118 months) when, in 2009, patient satisfaction was assessed via a telephone survey. Questions related to the initial decision, the preprocedure education, implant experience, recovery, complications, and long-term satisfaction. Seventy-three percent of women listed cosmesis as their main reason for SMI, 76% had a mammogram since implant, and 89% reported no issues with mammography. Ninety-seven percent felt that SMI was the right choice and 95% stated they would do SMI again. Ninety-five percent also said they would recommend the procedure to others.
CONCLUSION: Complications were rare (three lead dislodgements and one pneumothorax). SMI has high patient acceptance and long-term satisfaction with few complications. This procedure should be considered in women requiring device implantation. ©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723082     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02871.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Submammary placement of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a Singapore plastic surgeon experience.

Authors:  Jun Chance Goh; Elaine Boey; Pipin Kojodjojo; Nallathamby Vigneswaran
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.

Authors:  Ellen Paap; Marloes Witjes; Cary van Landsveld-Verhoeven; Ruud M Pijnappel; Angela H E M Maas; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Combined Subpectoral Implantation of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Augmentation Mammoplasty in a Young Female Patient.

Authors:  Dong-Jun Kim; Jae-Sun Uhm; Je Wook Park; Jong-Chan Youn; Dong Won Lee; Bon-Nyeo Koo; Moon-Hyoung Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Transaxillary Subpectoral Placement of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Young Female Patients.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Oh; Chae Min Kim; Seung Yong Song; Jae Sun Uhm; Dae Hyun Lew; Dong Won Lee
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-01-20

5.  Assessing the Moderating Effect of the End User in Consumer Behavior: The Acceptance of Technological Implants to Increase Innate Human Capacities.

Authors:  Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo; Eva Reinares-Lara; Cristina Olarte-Pascual; Marta Garcia-Sierra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.