Literature DB >> 20723053

Spatial modelling and landscape-level approaches for visualizing intra-specific variation.

Henri A Thomassen1, Zachary A Cheviron, Adam H Freedman, Ryan J Harrigan, Robert K Wayne, Thomas B Smith.   

Abstract

Spatial analytical methods have been used by biologists for decades, but with new modelling approaches and data availability their application is accelerating. While early approaches were purely spatial in nature, it is now possible to explore the underlying causes of spatial heterogeneity of biological variation using a wealth of environmental data, especially from satellite remote sensing. Recent methods can not only make inferences regarding spatial relationships and the causes of spatial heterogeneity, but also create predictive maps of patterns of biological variation under changing environmental conditions. Here, we review the methods involved in making continuous spatial predictions from biological variation using spatial and environmental predictor variables, provide examples of their use and critically evaluate the advantages and limitations. In the final section, we discuss some of the key challenges and opportunities for future work.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723053     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04737.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  15 in total

1.  Identifying environmental correlates of intraspecific genetic variation.

Authors:  K A Harrisson; J D L Yen; A Pavlova; M L Rourke; D Gilligan; B A Ingram; J Lyon; Z Tonkin; P Sunnucks
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Range-wide spatial mapping reveals convergent character displacement of bird song.

Authors:  Alexander N G Kirschel; Nathalie Seddon; Joseph A Tobias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Quantifying effects of environmental and geographical factors on patterns of genetic differentiation.

Authors:  Cheng-Ruei Lee; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Ecological adaptation drives wood frog population divergence in life history traits.

Authors:  Emily H Le Sage; Sarah I Duncan; Travis Seaborn; Jennifer Cundiff; Leslie J Rissler; Erica J Crespi
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Selection and geographic isolation influence hummingbird speciation: genetic, acoustic and morphological divergence in the wedge-tailed sabrewing (Campylopterus curvipennis).

Authors:  Clementina González; Juan Francisco Ornelas; Carla Gutiérrez-Rodríguez
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Environmental variation and rivers govern the structure of chimpanzee genetic diversity in a biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  Matthew W Mitchell; Sabrina Locatelli; Paul R Sesink Clee; Henri A Thomassen; Mary Katherine Gonder
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Exploring Climate Niches of Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex Lawson) Haplotypes in the Western United States: Implications for Evolutionary History and Conservation.

Authors:  Douglas J Shinneman; Robert E Means; Kevin M Potter; Valerie D Hipkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Navigating the currents of seascape genomics: how spatial analyses can augment population genomic studies.

Authors:  Cynthia Riginos; Eric D Crandall; Libby Liggins; Pim Bongaerts; Eric A Treml
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  Assessing the cryptic invasion of a domestic conspecific: American mink in their native range.

Authors:  Kaela B Beauclerc; Jeff Bowman; Albrecht I Schulte-Hostedde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Tackling intraspecific genetic structure in distribution models better reflects species geographical range.

Authors:  Arnald Marcer; Belén Méndez-Vigo; Carlos Alonso-Blanco; F Xavier Picó
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.