OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between glycemic control and the executive functioning domain of cognition and to identify risk factors for inadequate glycemic control that may explain this relationship. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: In-person interviews conducted in participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-five rural older African Americans, American Indians, and whites with diabetes mellitus (DM) from three counties in south-central North Carolina. MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent uniform evaluations. Glycemic control was measured using a validated method, and executive function was assessed using a previously established set of measures and scoring procedure. Information pertaining to medication for treatment of DM, knowledge of DM, and DM self-care behaviors were obtained. RESULTS: In linear regression models adjusting for sex, age, education, ethnicity, duration of DM, and depressive symptoms, executive function was significantly associated with glycemic control. A 1-point higher executive function score was associated with a 0.47 lower glycosylated hemoglobin value (P=.01). The association between glycemic control and executive function became nonsignificant (P=.08) when controlling for several glycemic control risk factors, including use of DM medication and DM knowledge. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that poor glycemic control is associated with impairments in performance on composite measures of executive function and that modifiable risk factors for glycemic control such as use of DM medication and DM knowledge may explain this relationship.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between glycemic control and the executive functioning domain of cognition and to identify risk factors for inadequate glycemic control that may explain this relationship. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: In-person interviews conducted in participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-five rural older African Americans, American Indians, and whites with diabetes mellitus (DM) from three counties in south-central North Carolina. MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent uniform evaluations. Glycemic control was measured using a validated method, and executive function was assessed using a previously established set of measures and scoring procedure. Information pertaining to medication for treatment of DM, knowledge of DM, and DM self-care behaviors were obtained. RESULTS: In linear regression models adjusting for sex, age, education, ethnicity, duration of DM, and depressive symptoms, executive function was significantly associated with glycemic control. A 1-point higher executive function score was associated with a 0.47 lower glycosylated hemoglobin value (P=.01). The association between glycemic control and executive function became nonsignificant (P=.08) when controlling for several glycemic control risk factors, including use of DM medication and DM knowledge. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that poor glycemic control is associated with impairments in performance on composite measures of executive function and that modifiable risk factors for glycemic control such as use of DM medication and DM knowledge may explain this relationship.
Authors: Donald S Fong; Lloyd Aiello; Thomas W Gardner; George L King; George Blankenship; Jerry D Cavallerano; Fredrick L Ferris; Ronald Klein Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sara A Quandt; Ronny A Bell; Beverly M Snively; Shannon L Smith; Jeanette M Stafford; Lindsay K Wetmore; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2005 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Ronny A Bell; Shannon L Smith; Thomas A Arcury; Beverly M Snively; Jeanette M Stafford; Sara A Quandt Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ronny A Bell; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury; Beverly M Snively; Jeanette M Stafford; Shannon L Smith; Anne H Skelly Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2005 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Christina E Hugenschmidt; Fang-Chi Hsu; Satoru Hayasaka; J Jeffrey Carr; Barry I Freedman; David L Nyenhuis; Jeff D Williamson; Donald W Bowden Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Kristine Yaffe; Cherie Falvey; Nathan Hamilton; Ann V Schwartz; Eleanor M Simonsick; Suzanne Satterfield; Jane A Cauley; Caterina Rosano; Lenore J Launer; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Tamara B Harris Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-09
Authors: Jan Bressler; David S Knopman; A Richey Sharrett; Rebecca F Gottesman; Alan Penman; Patricia P Chang; Wayne D Rosamond; Eric Boerwinkle; Thomas H Mosley Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Kristen M Beavers; Iris Leng; Stephen R Rapp; Michael E Miller; Denise K Houston; Anthony P Marsh; Don G Hire; Laura D Baker; George A Bray; George L Blackburn; Andrea L Hergenroeder; John M Jakicic; Karen C Johnson; Mary T Korytkowski; Brent Van Dorsten; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jeannine S Skinner; Amy Morgan; Hector Hernandez-Saucedo; Angela Hansen; Selena Corbett; Matthew Arbuckle; James Ba Leverenz; Consuelo H Wilkins; Suzanne Craft; Laura D Baker Journal: J Gerontol Geriatr Res Date: 2015-07-23
Authors: Zaldy S Tan; Alexa S Beiser; Caroline S Fox; Rhoda Au; Jayandra J Himali; Stephanie Debette; Charles Decarli; Ramachandran S Vasan; Philip A Wolf; Sudha Seshadri Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nadia M Chu; Xiaomeng Chen; Alden L Gross; Michelle C Carlson; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Silas P Norman; Aarti Mathur; Maheen Z Abidi; Daniel C Brennan; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 3.456