BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that gastrointestinal (GI) microbes play a part in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from 16 healthy individuals and 16 CD patients (age- and sex-matched). The DNA extracted from these samples were subjected to two different methods of microbiome analysis. Specific bacterial groups were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods using primers designed using a high-throughput in-house bioinformatics pipeline. The same DNA extracts were also used to produce fluorescently labeled cRNA amplicons to interrogate a custom-designed phylogenetic microarray for intestinal bacteria. RESULTS: Even though the intersubject variability was high, differences in the fecal microbiomes of healthy and CD patients were detected. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Escherichia coli were more represented in healthy and ileal CD patients, respectively. Additionally, probes specific for Ruminococcus bromii, Oscillibacter valericigenes, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Eubacterium rectale produced stronger hybridization signals with the DNA samples from healthy subjects. Conversely, species overrepresented in CD patients were E. coli, Enterococcus faecium, and species from the Proteobacteria not normally found in the healthy human GI tract. Furthermore, we detected "healthy specific" molecular species or operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that are not closely related to any known species (Faecalibacterium, Subdoligranulum, and Oscillospora species), indicating that the phylogenetic dysbiosis is broader than at strain or species level. CONCLUSIONS: These two techniques of microbiome analysis provided a statistically robust new picture of the dysbiosis in fecal microbiota from ileal CD patients. Specifically, we identified a set of six species discriminant for CD, which provides a preliminary diagnostic tool.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that gastrointestinal (GI) microbes play a part in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from 16 healthy individuals and 16 CDpatients (age- and sex-matched). The DNA extracted from these samples were subjected to two different methods of microbiome analysis. Specific bacterial groups were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods using primers designed using a high-throughput in-house bioinformatics pipeline. The same DNA extracts were also used to produce fluorescently labeled cRNA amplicons to interrogate a custom-designed phylogenetic microarray for intestinal bacteria. RESULTS: Even though the intersubject variability was high, differences in the fecal microbiomes of healthy and CDpatients were detected. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Escherichia coli were more represented in healthy and ileal CDpatients, respectively. Additionally, probes specific for Ruminococcus bromii, Oscillibacter valericigenes, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Eubacterium rectale produced stronger hybridization signals with the DNA samples from healthy subjects. Conversely, species overrepresented in CDpatients were E. coli, Enterococcus faecium, and species from the Proteobacteria not normally found in the healthy human GI tract. Furthermore, we detected "healthy specific" molecular species or operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that are not closely related to any known species (Faecalibacterium, Subdoligranulum, and Oscillospora species), indicating that the phylogenetic dysbiosis is broader than at strain or species level. CONCLUSIONS: These two techniques of microbiome analysis provided a statistically robust new picture of the dysbiosis in fecal microbiota from ileal CDpatients. Specifically, we identified a set of six species discriminant for CD, which provides a preliminary diagnostic tool.
Authors: Páraic Ó Cuív; Daniel Aguirre de Cárcer; Michelle Jones; Eline S Klaassens; Daniel L Worthley; Vicki L J Whitehall; Seungha Kang; Christopher S McSweeney; Barbara A Leggett; Mark Morrison Journal: Microb Ecol Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 4.552
Authors: Shinichi Sunagawa; Daniel R Mende; Georg Zeller; Fernando Izquierdo-Carrasco; Simon A Berger; Jens Roat Kultima; Luis Pedro Coelho; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Julien Tap; Henrik Bjørn Nielsen; Simon Rasmussen; Søren Brunak; Oluf Pedersen; Francisco Guarner; Willem M de Vos; Jun Wang; Junhua Li; Joël Doré; S Dusko Ehrlich; Alexandros Stamatakis; Peer Bork Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2013-10-20 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Jason M Ridlon; Phillip B Hylemon; Leroy R Thacker; Douglas M Heuman; Sean Smith; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Patrick M Gillevet Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Severine Vermeire; Marie Joossens; Kristin Verbeke; Jun Wang; Kathleen Machiels; João Sabino; Marc Ferrante; Gert Van Assche; Paul Rutgeerts; Jeroen Raes Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Michael J Docktor; Bruce J Paster; Shelly Abramowicz; Jay Ingram; Yaoyu E Wang; Mick Correll; Hongyu Jiang; Sean L Cotton; Alexis S Kokaras; Athos Bousvaros Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 5.325