Literature DB >> 20720056

Efficacy and toxicity related to treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with 90Y-SIR spheres: radiobiologic considerations.

Lidia Strigari1, Rosa Sciuto, Sandra Rea, Livio Carpanese, Giuseppe Pizzi, Antonella Soriani, Giuseppe Iaccarino, Marcello Benassi, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Carlo Ludovico Maini.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Radioactive (90)Y-selective internal radiation (SIR) sphere therapy is increasingly used for the treatment of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the maximum delivered dose is limited by severe injury to the nontarget tissue, including liver parenchyma. Our study aimed to implement radiobiologic models for both tumor control probability (TCP) and normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) to describe more effectively local response and the liver toxicity rate, respectively.
METHODS: Patients with documented HCC, adequate bone marrow parameters, and regular hepatic and pulmonary function were eligible for the study. Patients who had pulmonary shunt greater than 20% of (99m)Tc-labeled macroaggregated albumin or any uncorrectable delivery to the gastrointestinal tract, reverse blood flow out of the liver, or complete portal vein thrombosis were excluded. Patients received a planned activity of the (90)Y-SIR spheres, determined using the empiric body surface area method. The dose distribution was determined using posttreatment (3-dimensional) activity distribution and Monte Carlo dose voxel kernel calculations, and the mean doses to healthy liver and tumor were calculated for each patient. Response was defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and recommendations of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). Criteria were used to assess possible liver toxicities. The parameters of TCP and NTCP models were established by direct maximization of the likelihood.
RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were treated. With an average dose of 110 Gy to the tumor, complete or partial response was observed in 74% and 55% of patients according to the EASL guideline and RECIST, respectively, and the predicted TCPs were 73% and 55%, respectively. With a median liver dose of 36 Gy (range, 6-78 Gy), the >or=grade 2 (G2), >or=grade 3 (G3), and >or=grade 4 (G4) liver toxicities were observed in 32% (23/73), 21% (15/73), and 11% (8/73) of patients, respectively. The parameters describing the >or=G2 liver toxicity data using the NTCP model were a tolerance dose of the whole organ leading to a 50% complication probability of 52 Gy (95% confidence interval, 44-61 Gy) and a slope of NTCP versus dose of 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.60), assuming n = 1.
CONCLUSION: The radiobiologic approach, based on patient-specific dosimetry, could improve the (90)Y-microsphere therapeutic approach of HCC, maintaining an acceptable liver toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20720056     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.075861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  81 in total

Review 1.  Hepatic radiation toxicity: avoidance and amelioration.

Authors:  Chandan Guha; Brian D Kavanagh
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization prior to transplantation.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Marco Colasanti; Edoardo De Werra; Gianluca Mascianà; Daniele Ferraro; Giovanni Tortorelli; Rosa Sciuto; Pierleone Lucatelli; Giuseppe Pizzi; Ubaldo Visco-Comandini; Giovanni Vennarecci
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; Lisa Bodei; Carlo Chiesa; Glenn Flux; Flavio Forrer; Françoise Kraeber-Bodere; Boudewijn Brans; Bieke Lambert; Mark Konijnenberg; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Jan Tennvall; Markus Luster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Dosimetry of yttrium-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for internal therapy: 86Y or 90Y imaging?

Authors:  Stephan Walrand; Glenn D Flux; Mark W Konijnenberg; Roelf Valkema; Eric P Krenning; Renaud Lhommel; Stanislas Pauwels; Francois Jamar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Role of Transcatheter Intra-arterial Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shashi B Paul; Hanish Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-24

Review 6.  Management of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: how do we decide among the various liver-directed treatments?

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; Bruno C Odisio; Milind Javle; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Christopher H Crane
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 7.  Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: current role and future directions - the medical oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Jeanne Tie; Lourens Bester
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-20

8.  Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Andrea Laurenzi; Marco Colasanti; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Raffaella Lionetti; Roberto Santoro; Pasquale Lepiane; Rosa Sciuto; Giuseppe Pizzi; Roberto Cianni; Rita Golfieri; Gianpiero D'Offizi; Adriano M Pellicelli; Mario Antonini; Giovanni Vennarecci
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role and perspectives.

Authors:  Cristina Mosconi; Alberta Cappelli; Cinzia Pettinato; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

10.  Selective Internal Radiation Therapy With Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres: Biases and Uncertainties in Absorbed Dose Calculations Between Clinical Dosimetry Models.

Authors:  Justin K Mikell; Armeen Mahvash; Wendy Siman; Veera Baladandayuthapani; Firas Mourtada; S Cheenu Kappadath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.