Literature DB >> 20720021

Poor positive accuracy of QuickVue rapid antigen tests during the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic.

Heather L Stevenson1, Michael J Loeffelholz.   

Abstract

We assessed the accuracy of positive QuickVue rapid influenza virus antigen test results. Using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR as the gold standard, 17 (37.8%) of 45 QuickVue-positive specimens were determined to be false positives. We report an unexpectedly high rate of false-positive QuickVue results during a period of high influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus prevalence.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20720021      PMCID： PMC2953107          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.01562-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  Factors affecting QuickVue Influenza A + B rapid test performance in the community setting.

Authors:  Calvin K Y Cheng; Benjamin J Cowling; Kwok Hung Chan; Vicky J Fang; Wing Hong Seto; Raymond Yung; Timothy M Uyeki; Peter M Houck; J S Malik Peiris; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Rapid-test sensitivity for novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans.

Authors:  Christopher C Blyth; Jonathan R Iredell; Dominic E Dwyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Evaluation of QuickVue influenza A+B rapid test for detection of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009.

Authors:  John Mark S Velasco; Maribel L Montesa-Develos; Richard G Jarman; Ma Nila B Lopez; Robert V Gibbons; Maria Theresa G Valderama; In-Kyu Yoon
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) Virus - United States, 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Use of rapid influenza diagnostic tests under field conditions as a screening tool during an outbreak of the 2009 novel influenza virus: practical considerations.

Authors:  Anthony R Sambol; Baha Abdalhamid; Elizabeth R Lyden; Tricia A Aden; Rhonda K Noel; Steven H Hinrichs
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Update: novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infections - worldwide, May 6, 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Rapid influenza antigen test for diagnosis of pandemic (H1N1) 2009.

Authors:  Janice K Louie; Hugo Guevara; Erica Boston; Melissa Dahlke; Maria Nevarez; Tong Kong; Robert Schechter; Carol A Glaser; David P Schnurr
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Poor clinical sensitivity of rapid antigen test for influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus.

Authors:  Jan Felix Drexler; Angelika Helmer; Heike Kirberg; Ulrike Reber; Marcus Panning; Marcel Müller; Katja Höfling; Bertfried Matz; Christian Drosten; Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak.

Authors:  Christine C Ginocchio; Frank Zhang; Ryhana Manji; Suman Arora; Mark Bornfreund; Leon Falk; Madhavi Lotlikar; Margaret Kowerska; George Becker; Diamanto Korologos; Marcella de Geronimo; James M Crawford
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  Rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of pandemic (Swine) influenza A/H1N1.

Authors:  Shawn Vasoo; Jane Stevens; Kamaljit Singh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 9.079
  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the Roche RealTime ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set with CDC A/H1N1pdm09 RT-PCR on samples from three hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Authors:  Nguyen thi Tham; Vu thi Ty Hang; Trong Huu Khanh; Do Chau Viet; Tran Tinh Hien; Jeremy Farrar; Nguyen van Vinh Chau; H Rogier van Doorn
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 2.  Update on influenza diagnostics: lessons from the novel H1N1 influenza A pandemic.

Authors:  Swati Kumar; Kelly J Henrickson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  A phase II study of DAS181, a novel host directed antiviral for the treatment of influenza infection.

Authors:  Ronald B Moss; Carrie Hansen; Rebecca L Sanders; Stephen Hawley; Tiejun Li; Roy T Steigbigel
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Duplex molecular assay intended for point-of-care diagnosis of influenza A/B virus infection.

Authors:  Liang-Ta Wu; Isabelle Thomas; Martin D Curran; Joanna S Ellis; Surendra Parmar; Neha Goel; Pia I Sharma; Jean-Pierre Allain; Helen H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Pathology Consultation on Influenza Diagnostics.

Authors:  Allison R McMullen; Neil W Anderson; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Evaluating an app-guided self-test for influenza: lessons learned for improving the feasibility of study designs to evaluate self-tests for respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Monica L Zigman Suchsland; Ivan Rahmatullah; Barry Lutz; Victoria Lyon; Shichu Huang; Enos Kline; Chelsey Graham; Shawna Cooper; Philip Su; Sam Smedinghoff; Helen Y Chu; Kara Sewalk; John S Brownstein; Matthew J Thompson
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.090
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.