Literature DB >> 20719522

A case for one-stage revision in infected total knee arthroplasty?

Richard W Parkinson1, Peter R Kay, Arvind Rawal.   

Abstract

Infection in total knee replacement is a rare but devastating complication. The current literature tends to support a two-stage revision as definitive treatment of established deep infection. Despite the fact that single stage revision is a well recognised treatment for the infected hip replacement, it has not gained the same level of support in the knee. This article reviews the literature of two-stage and single stage revision and reports the senior author's experience with the latter.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20719522     DOI： 10.1016/j.knee.2010.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN： 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  21 in total

1.  Two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: our experience with interval prosthesis.

Authors:  N Prasad; V Paringe; R Kotwal; A Ghandour; R Morgan Jones
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-05

Review 2.  The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Matthew J Donaldson; Jurek R Pietrzak; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

3.  Clinical faceoff: One- versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  One-stage versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Navraj S Nagra; Thomas W Hamilton; Sameer Ganatra; David W Murray; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Can Good Infection Control Be Obtained in One-stage Exchange of the Infected TKA to a Rotating Hinge Design? 10-year Results.

Authors:  Akos Zahar; Daniel O Kendoff; Till O Klatte; Thorsten A Gehrke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Late Streptococcus bovis infection of total knee replacement complicated by infective endocarditis and associated with colonic ulcers.

Authors:  Mathias Thomas Nagy; Sann Minn Hla; Graham Watson Keys
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-06-05

7.  Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two-stage revision.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Timothy G Petheram; Steven Kurtz; Yrjö T Konttinen; Paul Gregg; David Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?

Authors:  Fares Sami Haddad; Mohamed Sukeik; Sulaiman Alazzawi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement.

Authors:  James P M Masters; Nicholas A Smith; Pedro Foguet; Mike Reed; Helen Parsons; Andrew P Sprowson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Septic arthritis of the knee: the use and effect of antibiotics prior to diagnostic aspiration.

Authors:  P Hindle; E Davidson; L C Biant
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.891
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.