OBJECTIVE: To define the value of multislice computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients (age range: 20-92 years) who were referred to the emergency CT department with a clinical suspicion of AMI were prospectively included in the study. CT examinations were performed with a multislice (16) CT scanner and the protocol included pre-contrast, arterial and venous phase acquisitions. Images were evaluated by using multiplanar reconstruction, maximum intensity projection and volume-rendering techniques at the CT workstation. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (47%) underwent surgery for AMI or for other causes of acute abdominal pain. One hundred-six patients (53%) were followed conservatively according to clinical, radiologic and laboratory findings. Of the 94 patients who underwent surgery, 49 (25%) were found to have AMI. All of these 49 patients with a proven AMI diagnosis were diagnosed with CT. In the other 45 patients who underwent surgery, CT findings were negative for AMI. None of the patients, who were followed conservatively, were eventually diagnosed as having AMI except 1 patient. This patient was unfit for surgery although his clinical and radiologic findings were consistent with AMI and died in 3 days. The sensitivity and specificity values of CT for the detection of AMI were calculated to be 100% for each. CONCLUSIONS: Multislice CT is an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of AMI with excellent sensitivity and specificity values.
OBJECTIVE: To define the value of multislice computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients (age range: 20-92 years) who were referred to the emergency CT department with a clinical suspicion of AMI were prospectively included in the study. CT examinations were performed with a multislice (16) CT scanner and the protocol included pre-contrast, arterial and venous phase acquisitions. Images were evaluated by using multiplanar reconstruction, maximum intensity projection and volume-rendering techniques at the CT workstation. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (47%) underwent surgery for AMI or for other causes of acute abdominal pain. One hundred-six patients (53%) were followed conservatively according to clinical, radiologic and laboratory findings. Of the 94 patients who underwent surgery, 49 (25%) were found to have AMI. All of these 49 patients with a proven AMI diagnosis were diagnosed with CT. In the other 45 patients who underwent surgery, CT findings were negative for AMI. None of the patients, who were followed conservatively, were eventually diagnosed as having AMI except 1 patient. This patient was unfit for surgery although his clinical and radiologic findings were consistent with AMI and died in 3 days. The sensitivity and specificity values of CT for the detection of AMI were calculated to be 100% for each. CONCLUSIONS: Multislice CT is an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of AMI with excellent sensitivity and specificity values.
Authors: Carlos Pérez-García; Enrique de Miguel Campos; Adriana Fernández Gonzalo; Carlos Malfaz; Jesus Javier Martín Pinacho; Carmen Fernández Álvarez; Raquel Herranz Pérez Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Marcos D Guimaraes; Almir G V Bitencourt; Edson Marchiori; Rubens Chojniak; Jefferson L Gross; Vikas Kundra Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Markus M Obmann; Gopal Punjabi; Verena C Obmann; Daniel T Boll; Tobias Heye; Matthias R Benz; Benjamin M Yeh Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-06-30
Authors: J V T Tilsed; A Casamassima; H Kurihara; D Mariani; I Martinez; J Pereira; L Ponchietti; A Shamiyeh; F Al-Ayoubi; L A B Barco; M Ceolin; A J G D'Almeida; S Hilario; A L Olavarria; M M Ozmen; L F Pinheiro; M Poeze; G Triantos; F T Fuentes; S U Sierra; K Soreide; H Yanar Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.693