| Literature DB >> 20718526 |
Oranit B Davidson1, Dov Eden, Mina Westman, Yochi Cohen-Charash, Leslie B Hammer, Avraham N Kluger, Moshe Krausz, Christina Maslach, Michael O'Driscoll, Pamela L Perrewé, James Campbell Quick, Zehava Rosenblatt, Paul E Spector.
Abstract
A rigorous quasi-experiment tested the ameliorative effects of a sabbatical leave, a special case of respite from routine work. We hypothesized that (a) respite increases resource level and well-being and (b) individual differences and respite features moderate respite effects. A sample of 129 faculty members on sabbatical and 129 matched controls completed measures of resource gain, resource loss, and well-being before, during, and after the sabbatical. Among the sabbatees, resource loss declined and resource gain and well-being rose during the sabbatical. The comparison group showed no change. Moderation analysis revealed that those who reported higher respite self-efficacy and greater control, were more detached, had a more positive sabbatical experience, and spent their sabbatical outside their home country enjoyed more enhanced well-being than others. Copyright 2010 APA, all rights reservedMesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20718526 DOI: 10.1037/a0020068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Psychol ISSN: 0021-9010