Literature DB >> 20717716

Fat element-a new marker for chromosome and genome analysis in the Triticeae.

Ekaterina D Badaeva1, Svyatoslav A Zoshchuk, Etienne Paux, Georges Gay, Natalia V Zoshchuk, Delphine Roger, Alexander V Zelenin, Michel Bernard, Catherine Feuillet.   

Abstract

Chromosomal distribution of the Fat element that was isolated from bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) end sequences of wheat chromosome 3B was studied in 45 species representing eight genera of Poaceae (Aegilops, Triticum, Agropyron, Elymus, Secale, Hordeum, Avena and Triticale) using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). The Fat sequence was not present in oats and in two barley species, Hordeum vulgare and Hordeum spontaneum, that we investigated. Only very low amounts of the Fat element were detected on the chromosomes of two other barley species, Hordeum geniculatum and Hordeum chilense, with different genome compositions. The chromosomes of other cereal species exhibited distinct hybridisation patterns with the Fat probe, and labelling intensity varied significantly depending on the species or genome. The highest amount of hybridisation was detected on chromosomes of the D genome of Aegilops and Triticum and on chromosomes of the S genome of Agropyron. Despite the bioinformatics analysis of several BAC clones that revealed the tandem organisation of the Fat element, hybridisation with the Fat probe produces uneven, diffuse signals in the proximal regions of chromosomes. In some of the genomes we investigated, however, it also forms distinct, sharp clusters in chromosome-specific positions, and the brightest fluorescence was always observed on group 4 chromosomes. Thus, the Fat element represents a new family of Triticeae-specific, highly repeated DNA elements with a clustered-dispersed distribution pattern. These elements may have first emerged in cereal genomes at the time of divergence of the genus Hordeum from the last common ancestor. During subsequent evolution, the amount and chromosomal distribution of the Fat element changed due to amplification, elimination and re-distribution of this sequence. Because the labelling patterns that we detected were highly specific, the Fat element can be used as an accessory probe in FISH analysis for chromosome identification and investigation of evolutionary processes at the chromosomal level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20717716     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-010-9151-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  40 in total

1.  Chromosomal distribution of reverse transcriptase-containing retroelements in two Triticeae species.

Authors:  A Belyayev; O Raskina; E Nevo
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  A whole-genome snapshot of 454 sequences exposes the composition of the barley genome and provides evidence for parallel evolution of genome size in wheat and barley.

Authors:  Thomas Wicker; Stefan Taudien; Andreas Houben; Beat Keller; Andreas Graner; Matthias Platzer; Nils Stein
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Reconstruction of the phylogeny of the genus Triticum from variation in repeated nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  J Dvořák; H B Zhang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genome size and the proportion of repeated nucleotide sequence DNA in plants.

Authors:  R B Flavell; M D Bennett; J B Smith; D B Smith
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  The genomic organization of Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons in Helianthus (Asteraceae) homoploid hybrid species.

Authors:  S Evan Staton; Mark C Ungerer; Richard C Moore
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Molecular cytogenetics and tandem repeat sequence evolution in the allopolyploid Nicotiana rustica compared with diploid progenitors N. paniculata and N. undulata.

Authors:  K Y Lim; R Matyasek; A Kovarik; J Fulnecek; A R Leitch
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Variability of the chromosomal distribution of Ty3-gypsy retrotransposons in the populations of two wild Triticeae species.

Authors:  A Belyayev; O Raskina; E Nevo
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley.

Authors:  W L Gerlach; J R Bedbrook
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1979-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Analysis and chromosomal localization of retrotransposons in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): LINEs and Ty1-copia-like elements as major components of the genome.

Authors:  T Schmidt; S Kubis; J S Heslop-Harrison
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Genome differentiation in Aegilops. 1. Distribution of highly repetitive DNA sequences on chromosomes of diploid species.

Authors:  E D Badaeva; B Friebe; B S Gill
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.166

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tandem repeats on an eco-geographical scale: outcomes from the genome of Aegilops speltoides.

Authors:  Olga Raskina; Leonid Brodsky; Alexander Belyayev
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Comparative analysis of the N-genome in diploid and polyploid Aegilops species.

Authors:  Ekaterina D Badaeva; Olga S Dedkova; Svyatoslav A Zoshchuk; Alexandra V Amosova; Stephen M Reader; Michel Bernard; Alexander V Zelenin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Development and characterization of a complete set of Triticum aestivum-Roegneria ciliaris disomic addition lines.

Authors:  Lingna Kong; Xinying Song; Jin Xiao; Haojie Sun; Keli Dai; Caixia Lan; Pawan Singh; Chunxia Yuan; Shouzhong Zhang; Ravi Singh; Haiyan Wang; Xiue Wang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Molecular cytogenetic (FISH) and genome analysis of diploid wheatgrasses and their phylogenetic relationship.

Authors:  Gabriella Linc; Eszter Gaál; István Molnár; Diana Icsó; Ekaterina Badaeva; Márta Molnár-Láng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.