Literature DB >> 20717051

Multifocal pupillographic perimetry with white and colored stimuli.

Ted Maddess1, Yi-Ling Ho, Stephanie S Y Wong, Maria Kolic, Xin-Lin Goh, Corrine F Carle, Andrew C James.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated issues that could impair the capacity of multifocal pupilliographic perimetry to detect visual field damage. Differential blue light absorbance causes between-subject variance so we compared stimuli with differing blue content. We also quantified declining response gain at higher stimulus intensities (saturation), which can reduce sensitivity to changes in the visual field.
METHODS: Independent stimuli were delivered to 44 regions of both eyes whereas pupil responses were recorded under infrared illumination. Luminance-response functions were measured at 88 locations for white, yellow, and red stimuli at luminances ranging from 36 to 288 cd/m2. Response saturation was quantified by fitting power functions: Response =α Luminance, z<1 indicating declining response gain. Experiments were conducted on 2 groups containing 16 and 18 different normal subjects. The second experiment was designed to confirm the results of the first and to include red stimuli.
RESULTS: Response saturation occurred in all visual field regions: the mean exponents ranged from 0.57 ± 0.01 to 0.74 ± 0.02 (mean ± SE), that is up to 30 SE away from an exponent of 1 (no saturation). The stimulus-response functions appeared to be determined by luminance rather than color. Signal to noise ratios and regional visual field sensitivities were similar for all stimulus colors.
CONCLUSIONS: Response saturation was a feature of all visual field locations. Stimuli with reduced blue light content produced the same signal to noise ratios as white stimuli. Given that these stimuli would not be affected by variable lens brunescence, they might be preferable for perimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20717051     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efb097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Multifocal pupillography identifies retinal dysfunction in early age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Andrew C James; Rohan W Essex; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography.

Authors:  Yanti Rosli; Corinne Frances Carle; Yiling Ho; Andrew Charles James; Maria Kolic; Emilie Marie Françoise Rohan; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  How lesions at different locations along the visual pathway influence pupillary reactions to chromatic stimuli.

Authors:  Carina Kelbsch; Krunoslav Stingl; Ronja Jung; Melanie Kempf; Paul Richter; Torsten Strasser; Tobias Peters; Barbara Wilhelm; Helmut Wilhelm; Felix Tonagel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of unifocal, flicker, and multifocal pupil perimetry methods in healthy adults.

Authors:  Brendan L Portengen; Giorgio L Porro; Saskia M Imhof; Marnix Naber
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Clustered Volleys Stimulus Presentation for Multifocal Objective Perimetry.

Authors:  Corinne F Carle; Andrew C James; Faran Sabeti; Maria Kolic; Rohan W Essex; Chris Shean; Rhiannon Jeans; Aiasha Saikal; Alice Licinio; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.