Literature DB >> 20716315

What are the 'ideal' features of an adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injector in the treatment of anaphylaxis?

A J Frew1.   

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction that often involves respiratory symptoms and cardiovascular collapse, which are potentially life-threatening if not treated promptly with intramuscular adrenaline. Owing to the unpredictable nature of anaphylaxis and accidental exposure to allergens (such as peanuts and shellfish), patients should be prescribed intramuscular adrenaline auto-injectors and carry these with them at all times. Patients also need to be able to use their auto-injectors correctly while under high stress, when an anaphylactic attack occurs. Despite this, an alarming number of patients fail to carry their auto-injectors and many patients, carers of children with known anaphylaxis and healthcare professionals do not know how to use the device correctly, despite having had training. Currently available auto-injector devices have various limitations that may impede their use in the management of anaphylaxis. There is also a lack of validated assessment criteria and regulatory requirements for new devices. This review describes the different delivery systems used in currently available auto-injectors and discusses the key barriers to the use of adrenaline auto-injectors, with the goal of identifying the 'ideal' features/characteristics of such devices in the emergency treatment of anaphylaxis that will ensure ease of use, portability and accurate delivery of a life-saving drug.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20716315     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02450.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of moist inhalation epinephrine using a mobile inhaler.

Authors:  C Breuer; B Wachall; K Gerbeth; M Abdel-Tawab; U Fuhr
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Are adrenaline autoinjectors fit for purpose? A pilot study of the mechanical and injection performance characteristics of a cartridge-versus a syringe-based autoinjector.

Authors:  Andreas Schwirtz; Harald Seeger
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2010-11-25

3.  What factors affect the carriage of epinephrine auto-injectors by teenagers?

Authors:  Clare Macadam; Julie Barnett; Graham Roberts; Gary Stiefel; Rosemary King; Michel Erlewyn-Lajeunesse; Judith A Holloway; Jane S Lucas
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.871

4.  Autoinjectors Preferred for Intramuscular Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis and Allergic Reactions.

Authors:  Ronna L Campbell; M Fernanda Bellolio; Megan S Motosue; Kharmene L Sunga; Christine M Lohse; Maria I Rudis
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-10-07

Review 5.  Update on the usage and safety of epinephrine auto-injectors, 2017.

Authors:  Larry S Posner; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 6.  Adrenaline auto-injectors for the treatment of anaphylaxis with and without cardiovascular collapse in the community.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; F Estelle R Simons; Victoria Barbour; Allison Worth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

7.  Comparison of the robustness and functionality of three adrenaline auto-injectors.

Authors:  Andreas Schwirtz; Harald Seeger
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2012-08-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.