WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Cysteamine bitartrate is taken lifelong, every 6 h and for the treatment of cystinosis. Recent studies using cysteamine for for other diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders adopt the same dosing regimen for cysteamine. Regular cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon) may cause upper gastrointestinal symptoms in some patients. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This is the only study that provides pharmacokinetic data for cysteamine delivered in an enteric-release preparation in normal subjects. EC-cysteamine is very well tolerated and does not cause increased gastrin concentrations, even at relatively high doses. EC-cysteamine at the higher dose results in better drug uptake as measured by Cmax and AUC and is more likely to be effective. AIMS: Cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon) is the approved treatment for cystinosis. Poor compliance and patient outcome may occur because the drug needs to be taken every 6 h and in some patients causes gastrointestinal symptoms due to hypergastrinaemia. A formulation of cysteamine requiring twice daily ingestion would improve the quality of life for these patients. This study compares the pharmacokinetics and gastrin production following cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated in normal healthy subjects. METHODS: Enteric-coated cysteamine was prepared. Following single doses of cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated 450 mg and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated 450 mg and 900 mg, serial plasma cysteamine and gastrin concentrations were measured. Two subjects also received cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated 900 mg. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were recorded. RESULTS: Six healthy adults (mean age 20.7 years, range 18-24 years; mean weight 59.3 kg) received drug. All post-dose gastrin concentrations were within the normal range (<100 pg ml(-1)). The tmax following cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated (mean and SD is 75+/-19 min) was shorter than cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated (220+/-74 min) (P=0.001), but only the Cmax and AUC estimates following 900 mg cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated were significantly greater than any of the other preparations or doses (P<0.05). One patient had GI symptoms following both 900 mg cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated. CONCLUSION: Although patient numbers were low, single high doses of cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated were better tolerated than similar doses of cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated in the healthy subjects and all had normal gastrin concentrations. The delayed tmax following cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated suggested that the cysteamine was released enterically.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT:Cysteamine bitartrate is taken lifelong, every 6 h and for the treatment of cystinosis. Recent studies using cysteamine for for other diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders adopt the same dosing regimen for cysteamine. Regular cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon) may cause upper gastrointestinal symptoms in some patients. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This is the only study that provides pharmacokinetic data for cysteamine delivered in an enteric-release preparation in normal subjects. EC-cysteamine is very well tolerated and does not cause increased gastrin concentrations, even at relatively high doses. EC-cysteamine at the higher dose results in better drug uptake as measured by Cmax and AUC and is more likely to be effective. AIMS: Cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon) is the approved treatment for cystinosis. Poor compliance and patient outcome may occur because the drug needs to be taken every 6 h and in some patients causes gastrointestinal symptoms due to hypergastrinaemia. A formulation of cysteamine requiring twice daily ingestion would improve the quality of life for these patients. This study compares the pharmacokinetics and gastrin production following cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated in normal healthy subjects. METHODS: Enteric-coated cysteamine was prepared. Following single doses of cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated 450 mg and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated 450 mg and 900 mg, serial plasma cysteamine and gastrin concentrations were measured. Two subjects also received cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated 900 mg. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were recorded. RESULTS: Six healthy adults (mean age 20.7 years, range 18-24 years; mean weight 59.3 kg) received drug. All post-dose gastrin concentrations were within the normal range (<100 pg ml(-1)). The tmax following cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated (mean and SD is 75+/-19 min) was shorter than cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated (220+/-74 min) (P=0.001), but only the Cmax and AUC estimates following 900 mg cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated were significantly greater than any of the other preparations or doses (P<0.05). One patient had GI symptoms following both 900 mg cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated. CONCLUSION: Although patient numbers were low, single high doses of cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated were better tolerated than similar doses of cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated in the healthy subjects and all had normal gastrin concentrations. The delayed tmax following cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated suggested that the cysteamine was released enterically.
Authors: Robert Kleta; Isa Bernardini; Masako Ueda; William S Varade; Chanika Phornphutkul; Donna Krasnewich; William A Gahl Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: W A Gahl; G F Reed; J G Thoene; J D Schulman; W B Rizzo; A J Jonas; D W Denman; J J Schlesselman; B J Corden; J A Schneider Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1987-04-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daryl M Okamura; Nadia M Bahrami; Shuyu Ren; Katie Pasichnyk; Juliana M Williams; Jon A Gangoiti; Jesus M Lopez-Guisa; Ikuyo Yamaguchi; Bruce A Barshop; Jeremy S Duffield; Allison A Eddy Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Craig B Langman; Larry A Greenbaum; Minnie Sarwal; Paul Grimm; Patrick Niaudet; Georges Deschênes; Elisabeth Cornelissen; Denis Morin; Pierre Cochat; Debora Matossian; Segolene Gaillard; Mary Jo Bagger; Patrice Rioux Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Joel E Lavine; Laura A Wilson; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Stavra A Xanthakos; Rohit Kohli; Sarah E Barlow; Miriam B Vos; Saul J Karpen; Jean P Molleston; Peter F Whitington; Philip Rosenthal; Ajay K Jain; Karen F Murray; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Mark L Van Natta; Jeanne M Clark; James Tonascia; Edward Doo Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Toshio Fujisawa; Benjamin Rubin; Akiko Suzuki; Prabhudas S Patel; William A Gahl; Bharat H Joshi; Raj K Puri Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rajat Chauhan; Kelsey Kinney; Archana Akalkotkar; Betty M Nunn; Robert S Keynton; Patricia A Soucy; Martin G O'Toole Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 4.036
Authors: Cécile L Berends; Lisa Pagan; Michiel J van Esdonk; Naomi B Klarenbeek; Kirsten R Bergmann; Matthijs Moerland; Vincent van der Wel; Saco J de Visser; Hans Büller; Frans de Loos; Wouter S de Vries; Hans Waals; Leo G J de Leede; Jacobus Burggraaf; Ingrid M C Kamerling Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2021-04