Literature DB >> 20716234

Cost-effectiveness analysis and efficient use of the pharmaceutical budget: the key role of clinical pharmacologists.

Richard Edlin1, Jeff Round, Claire Hulme, Christopher McCabe.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide information about cost-effectiveness analysis and the roles of clinical pharmacologists generally in providing efficient health care. The paper highlights the potential consequences of 'off-label prescribing' and 'indication creep' behaviour given slower growth (or potential cuts) in the NHS budget. This paper highlights the key roles of clinical pharmacologists in delivering an efficient health care system when resources are allocated using cost-effectiveness analyses. It describes what cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is and how incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are used to identify efficient options. After outlining the theoretical framework within which using CEA can promote the efficient allocation of the health care budget, it considers the place of disinvestment within achieving efficient resource allocation. Clinical pharmacologists are argued to be critical to providing improved population health under CEA-based resource allocation processes because of their roles in implementation and disinvestment. Given that the challenges facing the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) are likely to increase, this paper sets out the stark choices facing clinical pharmacologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20716234      PMCID: PMC2949906          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  7 in total

Review 1.  Twenty-five years of programme budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974-1999.

Authors:  C Mitton; C Donaldson
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2001-10

2.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Authors:  E Fenwick; K Claxton; M Sculpher
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Authors:  Elisabeth Fenwick; Sarah Byford
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  Indication creep: physician beware.

Authors:  Paul C Hébert; Matthew Stanbrook
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means.

Authors:  Christopher McCabe; Karl Claxton; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis.

Authors:  David Arnold; Alan Girling; Andrew Stevens; Richard Lilford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-22

7.  Searching for a threshold, not setting one: the role of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

Authors:  Anthony Culyer; Christopher McCabe; Andrew Briggs; Karl Claxton; Martin Buxton; Ron Akehurst; Mark Sculpher; John Brazier
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-01
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  From NCE to NICE: the role of pharmacoeconomics.

Authors:  Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  World health dilemmas: Orphan and rare diseases, orphan drugs and orphan patients.

Authors:  Christina N Kontoghiorghe; Nicholas Andreou; Katerina Constantinou; George J Kontoghiorghes
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-09-26

Review 3.  Critical care nephrology: could it be a model of multidisciplinarity in ICU nowadays for other sub-specialities - the jury is out.

Authors:  Patrick M Honoré; Rita Jacobs; Olivier Joannes-Boyau; Elisabeth De Waele; Jouke De Regt; Viola Van Gorp; Herbert D Spapen
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2014-11-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.