Literature DB >> 20716076

Incidence of sore throat in children following use of flexible laryngeal mask airways - impact of an introducer device.

Anthea William1, Neil A Chambers, Thomas O Erb, Britta S von Ungern-Sternberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) is more difficult and therefore might result in a higher risk for trauma to the upper airway. To facilitate the insertion of FLMA, the use of an introducer device (Portex Limited, Hythe, Kent, UK) was promoted. However, the impact of the use of this device on the occurrence of postoperative sore throat is unknown.
METHODS: Four hundred children (3-21 years) undergoing elective ambulatory surgery were consecutively included in this study. In 196 cases, the FLMA was inserted using an introducer device. The FLMA cuff was then inflated and the pressure adjusted to below 60 cmH(2)O (according to manufacturers guidelines) using a calibrated cuff manometer (Portex Limited). Three types of FLMA were available: FLMA classic, FLMA unique (both FLMA PacMed, Richmond, Victoria, Australia) and FLMA ProBreathe (Well Lead Medical Co Ltd., Hualong, Guangzhou, China). Prior to discharge, patients' pain was assessed using an age appropriate scale.
RESULTS: Thirteen children (3.3%) developed sore throat, two (0.5%) sore neck and three (0.75%) sore jaw. Of those that developed sore throat, seven had a FLMA inserted with an introducer, six without an introducer. Using a laryngeal mask airways (LMA) with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC), surface was associated with a higher risk for sore throat compared with an LMA with a silicone surface (P = 0.0002).
CONCLUSION: In this study with controlled low cuff pressures, the incidence of sore throat was low. The use of an introducer device did not affect the rate of sore throat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20716076     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03372.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  6 in total

1.  Clinical Outcomes of a Modified Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA® Gastro™ Airway) During Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Hakim; Jason Bryant; Renata Miketic; Kent Williams; Steven H Erdman; Shabana Z Shafy; Stephani S Kim; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-09-21

2.  Postoperative Respiratory Complications of Laryngeal Mask Airway and Tracheal Tube in Ear, Nose and Throat Operations.

Authors:  Reza Safaeian; Valiollah Hassani; Gholamreza Movasaghi; Mahzad Alimian; Hamid Reza Faiz
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-08-24

Review 3.  Airway Complications during and after General Anesthesia: A Comparison, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Using Flexible Laryngeal Mask Airways and Endotracheal Tubes.

Authors:  Rui Xu; Ying Lian; Wen Xian Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing a novel second generation laryngeal mask airway using the 'ADEPT' approach: results from the LMA® Protector™ observational study.

Authors:  A Ní Eochagáin; V Athanassoglou; A Cumberworth; O Morris; S Corbett; H Jefferson; E P O'Sullivan; J J Pandit
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 1.977

5.  Extraglottic airway devices: A review.

Authors:  Ramesh Ramaiah; Debasmita Das; Sanjay M Bhananker; Aaron M Joffe
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-01

6.  Observation of ventilation effects of I-gel™, Supreme™ and Ambu AuraOnce™ with respiratory dynamics monitoring in small children.

Authors:  Zhiqing Gu; Quanying Jin; Junjun Liu; Lianhua Chen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.502

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.