Literature DB >> 20715661

Diagnostic value of processing cytologic aspirates of renal tumors in agar cell (tissue) blocks.

Frank Smedts1, Maria Schrik, Thomas Horn, Anton H N Hopman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To adapt a method enabling utilization of most of the harvest from a fine needle aspirate in an effort to improve diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of a renal tumor in a single histologic slide. STUDY
DESIGN: In a series of 43 renal tumors, 2 fine needle aspirations were performed, 4 smears were prepared after each aspiration for conventional cytology and the remaining aspirate was processed for the improved agar microbiopsy (AM) method. Conventional cytology slides, AM slides and surgical specimens were diagnosed separately, after which the diagnoses were compared. Immunohistochemistry was performed as required on the AM sections. Surgical specimens served as the gold standard.
RESULTS: In 53% of conventional cytologic smears, the cellular yield was sufficient to render a correct diagnosis. In 12% the diagnosis was incorrect, in 21% only a differential diagnosis could be formulated, and in 14% too few diagnostic cells were present in the conventional smears for a cytologic diagnosis. It was, however, possible to correctly diagnose histologic sections from 97% of AM tissue blocks. In 11 cases this was facilitated with immunohistochemistry. In only 1 case did the AM tissue block contain too few cells to formulate a diagnosis; the conventional cytologic sample in this case contained enough diagnostic cells. In all cases the AM diagnosis was confirmed in the definitive surgical specimen.
CONCLUSION: Our AM technique for processing fine needle aspirates from renal tumors results in a major enhancement of diagnostic accuracy of such aspirates and should be valuable in the preoperative diagnosis of large, as well as small, renal tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20715661     DOI: 10.1159/000325182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  3 in total

1.  The cell block technique revisited for cells cultured in adherence and as "spheres".

Authors:  Cristina Zanini; Marco Forni
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  Viral load, gene expression and mapping of viral integration sites in HPV16-associated HNSCC cell lines.

Authors:  Nadine C Olthof; Christian U Huebbers; Jutta Kolligs; Mieke Henfling; Frans C S Ramaekers; Iris Cornet; Josefa A van Lent-Albrechts; Alexander P A Stegmann; Steffi Silling; Ulrike Wieland; Thomas E Carey; Heather M Walline; Susanne M Gollin; Thomas K Hoffmann; Johan de Winter; Bernd Kremer; Jens P Klussmann; Ernst-Jan M Speel
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Validation of immunohistochemical tests performed on cytology cell block material: Practical application of the College of American Pathologists' guidelines.

Authors:  Swati Satturwar; Renuka Malenie; Ann Sutton; Ding Dai; F Zahra Aly
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.091

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.