Literature DB >> 20715627

Working less to gain more: when breeding quality relates to foraging efficiency.

Amélie Lescroël1, Grant Ballard, Viola Toniolo, Kerry J Barton, Peter R Wilson, Philip O'B Lyver, David G Ainley.   

Abstract

In animal populations, a minority of individuals consistently achieves the highest breeding success and therefore contributes the most recruits to future generations. On average, foraging performance is important in determining breeding success at the population level, but evidence is scarce to show that more successful breeders (better breeders) forage differently than less successful ones (poorer breeders). To test this hypothesis, we used a 10-year, three-colony, individual-based longitudinal data set on breeding success and foraging parameters of a long-lived bird, the Adélie Penguin, Pygoscelis adeliae. Better breeders foraged more efficiently than poorer breeders under harsh environmental conditions and when offspring needs were higher, therefore gaining higher net energy profit to be allocated to reproduction and survival. These results imply that adverse "extrinsic" conditions might select breeding individuals on the basis of their foraging ability. Adélie Penguins show sufficient phenotypic plasticity that at least a portion of the population is capable of surviving and successfully reproducing despite extreme variability in their physical and biological environment, variability that is likely to be associated with climate change and, ultimately, with the species' evolution. This study is the first to demonstrate the importance of "extrinsic" conditions (in terms of environmental conditions and offspring needs) on the relationship between foraging behavior and individual quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20715627     DOI: 10.1890/09-0766.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  24 in total

1.  Variability in temporary emigration rates of individually marked female Weddell seals prior to first reproduction.

Authors:  Glenn E Stauffer; Jay J Rotella; Robert A Garrott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Foraging strategies of individual silky pocket mice over a boom-bust cycle in a stochastic dryland ecosystem.

Authors:  Jennifer D Noble; Scott L Collins; Alesia J Hallmark; Karin Maldonado; Blair O Wolf; Seth D Newsome
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Survival differences and the effect of environmental instability on breeding dispersal in an Adelie penguin meta-population.

Authors:  Katie M Dugger; David G Ainley; Phil O'B Lyver; Kerry Barton; Grant Ballard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fitness outcomes in relation to individual variation in constitutive innate immune function.

Authors:  Michael J Roast; Nataly Hidalgo Aranzamendi; Marie Fan; Niki Teunissen; Matthew D Hall; Anne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Early-life behaviour predicts first-year survival in a long-distance avian migrant.

Authors:  Shay Rotics; Sondra Turjeman; Michael Kaatz; Damaris Zurell; Martin Wikelski; Nir Sapir; Wolfgang Fiedler; Ute Eggers; Yehezkel S Resheff; Florian Jeltsch; Ran Nathan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Does foraging behaviour affect female mate preferences and pair formation in captive zebra finches?

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Cavina Bui; Krista Howarth; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Louis Lefebvre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Movement patterns for a critically endangered species, the leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), linked to foraging success and population status.

Authors:  Helen Bailey; Sabrina Fossette; Steven J Bograd; George L Shillinger; Alan M Swithenbank; Jean-Yves Georges; Philippe Gaspar; K H Patrik Strömberg; Frank V Paladino; James R Spotila; Barbara A Block; Graeme C Hays
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Shadowed by scale: subtle behavioral niche partitioning in two sympatric, tropical breeding albatross species.

Authors:  Melinda G Conners; Elliott L Hazen; Daniel P Costa; Scott A Shaffer
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.600

9.  Antarctic climate change: extreme events disrupt plastic phenotypic response in Adélie penguins.

Authors:  Amélie Lescroël; Grant Ballard; David Grémillet; Matthieu Authier; David G Ainley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Individual variation in parental workload and breeding productivity in female European starlings: is the effort worth it?

Authors:  Melinda A Fowler; Tony D Williams
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.