Literature DB >> 20715616

Diversity partitioning without statistical independence of alpha and beta.

Joseph A Veech1, Thomas O Crist.   

Abstract

Diversity partitioning has become a popular method for analyzing patterns of alpha and beta diversity. A recent evaluation of the method emphasized a distinction between additive and multiplicative partitioning and further advocated the use of multiplicative partitioning based on a presumed independence between alpha and beta. Concurrently, additive partitioning was criticized for producing dependent alpha and beta estimates. Until now, the issue of statistical independence of alpha and beta (in either type of partitioning) has not been thoroughly examined, partly due to confusion about the meaning of statistical independence. Here, we adopted a probability-based definition of statistical independence that is essentially identical to the definition found in any statistics textbook. We used a data simulation approach to show that alpha and beta diversity are not statistically independent in either additive or multiplicative partitioning. However, the extent of the dependence is not so great that it cannot be overcome by using appropriate statistical techniques to control it. Both additive and multiplicative partitioning are statistically valid and logically sound approaches to analyzing diversity patterns.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20715616     DOI: 10.1890/08-1727.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  10 in total

1.  Weed diversity is driven by complex interplay between multi-scale dispersal and local filtering.

Authors:  Bérenger Bourgeois; Sabrina Gaba; Christine Plumejeaud; Vincent Bretagnolle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Community assembly: alternative stable states or alternative transient states?

Authors:  Tadashi Fukami; Mifuyu Nakajima
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Carabidae diversity along an altitudinal gradient in a Peruvian cloud forest (Coleoptera).

Authors:  Sarah A Maveety; Robert A Browne; Terry L Erwin
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.546

5.  Interbasin water transfer, riverine connectivity, and spatial controls on fish biodiversity.

Authors:  Evan H Campbell Grant; Heather J Lynch; Rachata Muneepeerakul; Muthukumarasamy Arunachalam; Ignacio Rodríguez-Iturbe; William F Fagan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Alpha, beta and gamma diversity differ in response to precipitation in the Inner Mongolia grassland.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Xiangyang Hou; Frank Yonghong Li; Jianming Niu; Yanlin Zhou; Yong Ding; Liqing Zhao; Xin Li; Wenjing Ma; Sarula Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bioaerosols Play a Major Role in the Nasopharyngeal Microbiota Content in Agricultural Environment.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Jonathan Pilote; Valérie Létourneau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Assessment of the stream invertebrate β -diversity along an elevation gradient using a bidimensional null model analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Timoner; Pierre Marle; Emmanuel Castella; Anthony Lehmann
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Inferring species richness and turnover by statistical multiresolution texture analysis of satellite imagery.

Authors:  Matteo Convertino; Rami S Mangoubi; Igor Linkov; Nathan C Lowry; Mukund Desai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Guillaume Bilodeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.