Literature DB >> 2071531

Effects of animal-to-animal exchange of ruminal contents on the feed intake and ruminal characteristics of fed and fasted lambs.

N A Cole1.   

Abstract

Four Suffolk x Hampshire wether lambs averaging 55 kg with permanent ruminal cannulas were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design to determine the effects of exchange of ruminal contents between fed and fasted lambs on subsequent DMI and ruminal characteristics. Lambs were fed a pelleted 70% roughage diet at 2% of BW for 17 d. During each period of the Latin square two lambs were deprived of feed and water for 3 d. At the end of the fasting period ruminal contents from one fed and one fasted lamb were exchanged. Lambs were then given ad libitum access to feed for 8 d, during which DMI, feeding pattern, and ruminal characteristics were monitored. Measurements of ruminal volume determined by total collection and indigestible marker (lithium sulfate) suggested that only about 50% of total ruminal contents were actually exchanged. Fasted lambs had lower (P less than .05) DMI, ruminal fermentative capacity, ruminal DM weight, and ruminal DM percentage than fed lambs during the first 4 d of realimentation. Exchange of ruminal contents did not (P greater than .10) affect DMI, feeding pattern, ruminal fluid pH, ruminal fermentative capacity, ruminal contents DM percentage, ruminal nucleic acid concentration, or VFA. Dosing fasted lambs with ruminal contents from nonfasted lambs reduced (P less than .05) ruminal liquid volume, dry weight of ruminal contents, and propionate concentration. Results of this trial are interpreted to indicate that although decreased ruminal function is a factor in the low feed intakes of fasted ruminants, the possibility of increasing postfast feed intake via improved ruminal function is limited because other metabolic factors may play a more important role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2071531     DOI: 10.2527/1991.6941795x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Repeated inoculation of cattle rumen with bison rumen contents alters the rumen microbiome and improves nitrogen digestibility in cattle.

Authors:  Gabriel O Ribeiro; Daniela B Oss; Zhixiong He; Robert J Gruninger; Chijioke Elekwachi; Robert J Forster; WenZhu Yang; Karen A Beauchemin; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Identification of rumen microbial biomarkers linked to methane emission in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Laura Zingaretti; Milka Popova; Jordi Estellé; Aurelien Bernard; Nicolas Pons; Pau Bellot; Núria Mach; Andrea Rau; Hugo Roume; Miguel Perez-Enciso; Philippe Faverdin; Nadège Edouard; Dusko Ehrlich; Diego P Morgavi; Gilles Renand
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 3.  Redundancy, resilience, and host specificity of the ruminal microbiota: implications for engineering improved ruminal fermentations.

Authors:  Paul J Weimer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Chemical composition of solar dried blood and the ruminal content and its effect on performance of Japanese quails.

Authors:  Jyotiprabha Mishra; Robinson J J Abraham; V Appa Rao; R Asha Rajini; B P Mishra; N R Sarangi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-01-24

5.  Assessment of microbiome changes after rumen transfaunation: implications on improving feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Authors:  Mi Zhou; Yong-Jia Peng; Yanhong Chen; Christen M Klinger; Masahito Oba; Jian-Xin Liu; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 14.650

6.  Opportunities and limits of combining microbiome and genome data for complex trait prediction.

Authors:  Miguel Pérez-Enciso; Laura M Zingaretti; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.