Literature DB >> 20714506

Mechanistic insight into the recognition of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA substrates by ABH2 and ABH3.

Baoen Chen1, Hongchuan Liu, Xiaoxu Sun, Cai-Guang Yang.   

Abstract

The human ABH2 and ABH3 proteins are functionally complementary in the oxidative demethylation of N(1)-methyl adenine (1-meA) and N(3)-methyl cytosine (3-meC) nucleotide bases. ABH3 displays higher activities with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in vitro, whereas ABH2 acts as the primary housekeeping enzyme in mammals for effectively repairing endogenously formed alkylated lesions in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Structurally, their overall protein folding is quite similar, but the most significant differences occur in the nucleotide recognition lid and the β-hairpin motif. We present here a site-directed mutational analysis and motif-swapping study to gain mechanistic insight into DNA substrate selection by ABH2 and ABH3. A V101A-F102A double mutant notably reduced ABH2 activity in dsDNA, indicating that this hydrophobic region appears to be important for damage searching and repair. The phenylalanine finger F102 is found to be crucial for ssDNA selection and repair as well; however, V101 shows reduced demethylating activity for only ssDNA and not dsDNA. The ABH2 R110A mutant completely loses the methyl base repair activity, suggesting that R110 is likely to be involved in the base flipping process. E175 and F124 contribute to nucleotide base specific selection and stabilization in the active site for repair. Additionally, swapping the RED residues in ABH3 to equivalent VFG residues in ABH2 endows ABH3 with activity in dsDNA repair as efficient as wild-type ABH2. Surprisingly, by changing just a few residues, the ABH3 protein can have very different selectivity towards ssDNA or dsDNA. This result indicates that the RED motif most likely prevents ABH3 binding and repair of dsDNA. Consistently, swapped ABH3 cross-links with dsDNA very well, confirming the determining roles of these residues in the initial DNA strand recognition. Overall, this work has provided a detailed understanding of the structural features of the ssDNA and dsDNA preferences of ABH2 and ABH3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20714506     DOI: 10.1039/c005148a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  17 in total

1.  Adaptive Response Enzyme AlkB Preferentially Repairs 1-Methylguanine and 3-Methylthymine Adducts in Double-Stranded DNA.

Authors:  Fangyi Chen; Qi Tang; Ke Bian; Zachary T Humulock; Xuedong Yang; Marco Jost; Catherine L Drennan; John M Essigmann; Deyu Li
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  DNA repair by reversal of DNA damage.

Authors:  Chengqi Yi; Chuan He
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  6-Carboxyfluorescein and structurally similar molecules inhibit DNA binding and repair by O⁶-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase.

Authors:  Manana Melikishvili; David W Rodgers; Michael G Fried
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-10-05

4.  Deciphering the Molecular and Functional Basis of RHOGAP Family Proteins: A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TOWARD SELECTIVE INACTIVATION OF RHO FAMILY PROTEINS.

Authors:  Ehsan Amin; Mamta Jaiswal; Urszula Derewenda; Katarina Reis; Kazem Nouri; Katja T Koessmeier; Pontus Aspenström; Avril V Somlyo; Radovan Dvorsky; Mohammad R Ahmadian
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Multi-substrate selectivity based on key loops and non-homologous domains: new insight into ALKBH family.

Authors:  Baofang Xu; Dongyang Liu; Zerong Wang; Ruixia Tian; Yongchun Zuo
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  DNA unwinding by ASCC3 helicase is coupled to ALKBH3-dependent DNA alkylation repair and cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Sebastian Dango; Nima Mosammaparast; Mathew E Sowa; Li-Jun Xiong; Feizhen Wu; Keyjung Park; Mark Rubin; Steve Gygi; J Wade Harper; Yang Shi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  N(6)-Methyladenine in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Myles H Alderman; Andrew Z Xiao
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Rhein Inhibits AlkB Repair Enzymes and Sensitizes Cells to Methylated DNA Damage.

Authors:  Qi Li; Yue Huang; Xichun Liu; Jianhua Gan; Hao Chen; Cai-Guang Yang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Fluorescence Monitoring of the Oxidative Repair of DNA Alkylation Damage by ALKBH3, a Prostate Cancer Marker.

Authors:  Andrew A Beharry; Sandrine Lacoste; Timothy R O'Connor; Eric T Kool
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 10.  The AlkB Family of Fe(II)/α-Ketoglutarate-dependent Dioxygenases: Repairing Nucleic Acid Alkylation Damage and Beyond.

Authors:  Bogdan I Fedeles; Vipender Singh; James C Delaney; Deyu Li; John M Essigmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.