Literature DB >> 20713814

Confocal laser scanning microscopy vs 3-dimensional histologic imaging in basal cell carcinoma.

Sarah Ziefle1, Deborah Schüle, Helmut Breuninger, Wilfried Schippert, Matthias Moehrle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), which offers rapid images without the need for tissue processing, vs 3-dimensional histologic imaging, the criterion standard treatment for basal cell carcinomas in high-risk areas of the face.
DESIGN: Single-center prospective trial.
SETTING: Dermatosurgical unit of a university hospital. Patients Seventy-two consecutive surgically removed basal cell carcinomas were examined using CLSM vs standard paraffin-embedded 3-dimensional histologic imaging. Interventions A total of 312 images, including 73 midsections, 196 lateral margins, 23 "muffins," and 20 "bread loaf sections," were obtained using CLSM. Immediately after surgery, the CLSM images were evaluated by the surgeon. The following day, the 3-dimensional histologic slides were evaluated and compared with the CLSM images. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy of ex vivo CLSM to detect tumor strands of basal cell carcinomas and the practicality of using CLSM vs 3-dimensional histologic slides in micrographic surgery.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of CLSM reached 94.0% in midsections, 73.7% in lateral margins, 80.0% in muffins, and 80.0% in bread loaf sections. The CLSM images were evaluated by the surgeon within 7.5 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Confocal laser scanning microscopy lacks high sensitivity to detect small tumor strands of basal cell carcinomas. In the future, CLSM may represent a time-saving and less expensive alternative to cryostat histopathologic examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20713814     DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Novel approaches to imaging basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Anthony M Rossi; Heidy Sierra; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Kiswher Nehal
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Ex vivo confocal microscopy for surgical margin assessment: A histology-compared study on 109 specimens.

Authors:  L Grizzetti; F Kuonen
Journal:  Skin Health Dis       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 3.  In Vivo and Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy for Dermatologic and Mohs Surgeons.

Authors:  Caterina Longo; Moira Ragazzi; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Kishwer Nehal; Antoni Bennassar; Giovanni Pellacani; Josep Malvehy Guilera
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  High-speed combined reflectance confocal and moxifloxacin based two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Bumju Kim; Hoan Le; Byung-Ho Oh; Ki Hean Kim
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  An international 3-center training and reading study to assess basal cell carcinoma surgical margins with ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Kivanc Kose; Christi Alessi Fox; Anthony Rossi; Manu Jain; Miguel Cordova; Stephen W Dusza; Moira Ragazzi; Stefano Gardini; Elvira Moscarella; Alba Diaz; Ramon Pigem; Salvador Gonzalez; Antoni Bennassar; Cristina Carrera; Caterina Longo; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Kishwer S Nehal
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 1.587

6.  Ex vivo confocal microscopy: an emerging technique in dermatology.

Authors:  Elisa Cinotti; Jean Luc Perrot; Bruno Labeille; Frédéric Cambazard; Pietro Rubegni
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-04-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.