BACKGROUND: Few studies have simultaneously included exposure information on occupational hazards, relationship hazards (eg, intimate partner violence) and social hazards (eg, poverty and racial discrimination), especially among low-income multiracial/ethnic populations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study (2003-2004) of 1202 workers employed at 14 worksites in the greater Boston area of Massachusetts investigated the independent and joint association of occupational, social and relationship hazards with psychological distress (K6 scale). RESULTS: Among this low-income cohort (45% were below the US poverty line), exposure to occupational, social and relationship hazards, per the 'inverse hazard law,' was high: 82% exposed to at least one occupational hazard, 79% to at least one social hazard, and 32% of men and 34% of women, respectively, stated they had been the perpetrator or target of intimate partner violence (IPV). Fully 15.4% had clinically significant psychological distress scores (K6 score ≥ 13). All three types of hazards, and also poverty, were independently associated with increased risk of psychological distress. In models including all three hazards, however, significant associations with psychological distress occurred among men and women for workplace abuse and high exposure to racial discrimination only; among men, for IPV; and among women, for high exposure to occupational hazards, poverty and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Reckoning with the joint and embodied reality of diverse types of hazards involving how people live and work is necessary for understanding determinants of health status.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have simultaneously included exposure information on occupational hazards, relationship hazards (eg, intimate partner violence) and social hazards (eg, poverty and racial discrimination), especially among low-income multiracial/ethnic populations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study (2003-2004) of 1202 workers employed at 14 worksites in the greater Boston area of Massachusetts investigated the independent and joint association of occupational, social and relationship hazards with psychological distress (K6 scale). RESULTS: Among this low-income cohort (45% were below the US poverty line), exposure to occupational, social and relationship hazards, per the 'inverse hazard law,' was high: 82% exposed to at least one occupational hazard, 79% to at least one social hazard, and 32% of men and 34% of women, respectively, stated they had been the perpetrator or target of intimate partner violence (IPV). Fully 15.4% had clinically significant psychological distress scores (K6 score ≥ 13). All three types of hazards, and also poverty, were independently associated with increased risk of psychological distress. In models including all three hazards, however, significant associations with psychological distress occurred among men and women for workplace abuse and high exposure to racial discrimination only; among men, for IPV; and among women, for high exposure to occupational hazards, poverty and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Reckoning with the joint and embodied reality of diverse types of hazards involving how people live and work is necessary for understanding determinants of health status.
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Anne M Stoddard; Sonja Stoffel; Orfeu Buxton; Grace Sembajwe; Dean Hashimoto; Jack T Dennerlein; Karen Hopcia Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Candace C Nelson; Gregory R Wagner; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Orfeu M Buxton; Christopher T Kenwood; Erika L Sabbath; Dean M Hashimoto; Karen Hopcia; Jennifer Allen; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Henrik Borsting Jacobsen; Alberto Caban-Martinez; Lynn C Onyebeke; Glorian Sorensen; Jack T Dennerlein; Silje Endresen Reme Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Elizabeth S McClure; Pavithra Vasudevan; Nathan DeBono; Whitney R Robinson; Stephen W Marshall; David Richardson Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 2.214